@WisdomRebel https://t.co/iHKwUoNLJ5

https://t.co/sxm17Eu9hV

https://t.co/FtjifSGItc
PRRA is highly purified in the CaLu-3 cell line when FBS is added to inhibit trypsin. Stu lied about that in his defense on the FCS identity. https://t.co/GzM7uA6vup the Gallaher article contain glaring

@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel Mistakes and is completely impossible as HKU9 + RaTG13 only lead to a frameshift inactivated S and not a furin cleaved S.
https://t.co/gmDXK9OluN
The serological test the WIV claimed to be negative in Shi’s addendum is the exact same test they claimed positive in 2012 in the phD
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel thesis, and Stu once again lied about it. https://t.co/Uiy8U9BTYp significant evidence in the form of contaminated SRA datasets suggest that the DEFUSE grant have been funded in China, as the full-length HKU4 is not a part of the 2016-2019 grant, but is found before the start
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel Date of the 2020-2024 grant of June 2020. The WIV also contained several HKU3-like Coronaviruses, particularly in mice in an 2017 GEO experiment, which is consistent with the published HKU3 and batified mice experiment in the DEFUSE document (evidence from an already conducted
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel Experiment). Either DEFUSE or fast-tracked form of the 2020-2024 grant in 2019 would have lead to full-length Sarbecovirus clones being used, leading to SARS-CoV-2 in the lab—they used HKU4 in stead of HKU5 for the MERS spike experiment indicating that backbone sequence distance
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel Can not be too high for CoV chimeras, requiring the 4991 backbone or full-length 4991 to be used. In addition, https://t.co/sxm17Eu9hV the 201801-202102 grant of the WIV fits perfectly to DEFUSE since this is consistent with neither the Understanding risk of bat coronavirus
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel Emergence grant nor the EID hotspots in southeast asia grant.

https://t.co/YwSTyD3N8B

https://t.co/ySjXCH0k2V
In addition, the claim that the first infection was connected to the wet market is incorrect since the WHO report and the Zenodo-cell article used a resolution
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel Of cases that were far too low (which resulted in assigning cases to the wrong side of the yantgtze river) and have intentionally omitted the headquarters of the WIV https://t.co/w7d6bwbAn9 in Wuchang. In addition, the first patient on the WHO report went only to a supermarket in
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel Jiangxia, not any wet markets, and it just happened that the RT-mart he visited https://t.co/khQSq8ULAp is in Jiangxia, right next to the BSL-4 building of the WIV.
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel In addition, in contradiction to the Stu’s another claim that 4991 is “sequenced only after 2020”, the full-length sequence of 4991 was already discussed in 2018, and the S protein show significant divergence from RaTG13 when compared against SARS-CoV Urbani. https://t.co/VI7I3PwJoK
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel https://t.co/ejV0sIlzj5
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel https://t.co/ELNPYGVn00
In addition, other anomalies are found in the RBD, especially that of T403 and D501.
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel https://t.co/sxsPdd3kBd
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel https://t.co/bJma8XExej
In addition, evidence in the form of out-of-whack substitution ratios was found in the RBD of RaTg13, indicating that accelerated evolution in the form of 5-Fluorouracil usage was present in the S protein—which they then go on to compensate in a completely
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel Unnatural way in the S2 and the ORF1b using loads and loads of dS changes, throwing the ratios of dS/dN out of whack in both locations. https://t.co/J2YFuLKOqY
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel https://t.co/KmOFPkqo1H
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel The CGG-CGG pair is at the end point of RNA editing and can not be mutated in the CoV system except for very rare circumstances of RdRp error—it mutates at a rate that is less than 1/10 the rate others can, and no immediately ZAP-beneficial mutation lead to a dS on the CGG pair.
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel If you count this low rate of mutation that is possible in the CGG-CGG pair, it is under neutral to slightly positive selection, and not negative or purifying selection. https://t.co/jDy6RoYdSM as for the multi-market hypothesis? Sichuan had loads and loads (1/4 of all sequences)
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel That had only T8782C but not C28144T, four of such genomes were found in early Wuhan as well. The 8782/28144 distinction in Wuhan appears in-host before other changes begin to show, so there is no need of two separate introductions for A and B lineage. It happened in humans.
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel The FCS PRRARS is highly purified in CaLu-3 cell cultures. Any change to the AA gives significantly reduced infectivity. Therefore, a canonical FCS of RRARR will simply mutate and revert into PRRAR within just 3 passages in the CaLu-3 cell line.
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel https://t.co/53dG1S7LnL
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel https://t.co/pNwWQ8a7jy
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel And “when clear mismatches occur, we will introduce appropriate human-specific cleavage sites and evaluate growth potential in VERO and HAE cultures”. The PRRA is most conserved upon conjugate gradient selection with CaLu-3 as main passage cells and VERO E6 for stock preparation https://t.co/c7UNQR1cnY
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel between passages. https://t.co/nRTIU93WGP
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel https://t.co/Ff9XAc4ao3
In deed, CaLu-3 have 1/4 O-linked glycosylation that inhibits cleavage upon P681, saving the heparan sulfate binding peptide without compromising TMPRSS2 usage or immunogenicity. VERO E6 had even more O-linked glycosylation and HS binding as it have even
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel More uncleaved fractions with the PRRA compared to CaLu-3, and show a more pronounced advantage with PRRARS compared to RRRARS.
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel https://t.co/UpOM1kGzTK
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel In addition to the extremely high stability of PRRA in CaLu-3 and it's lack of stability in-vivo, some of the earliest patients in Wuhan harbored, by digital PCR and nanopore sequencing, large deletions across the QTQTN and SPRRARS https://t.co/YPHooePHko that are specific to
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel VERO E6 cell cultured SARS-CoV-2 strains--indicating that some of the quasispecies from the original cell culture were held over into the very first patients of SARS-CoV-2, strongly supporting the hypothesis that the PRRARS sequence being the result of composite selection
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel pressure generated from serial passage in CaLu-3 with stock preparation and storage in VERO E6 between passages, standard laboratory practices when it comes to the serial cell passage of viruses, which may also be employed if a transmissible vaccine (respiratory transmission with
@AngloScot2 @WisdomRebel no pathogenesis in aged WT BalB/C mice).

More from Daoyu

https://t.co/hXlo8qgkD0
Look like that they got a classical case of PCR Cross-Contamination.
They had 2 fabricated samples (SRX9714436 and SRX9714921) on the same PCR run. Alongside with Lung07. They did not perform metagenomic sequencing on the “feces” and they did not get


A positive oral or anal swab from anywhere in their sampling. Feces came from anus and if these were positive the anal swabs must also be positive. Clearly it got there after the NA have been extracted and were from the very low-level degraded RNA which were mutagenized from

The Taq.
https://t.co/yKXCgiT29w to see SRX9714921 and SRX9714436.
Human+Mouse in the positive SRA, human in both of them. Seeing human+mouse in identical proportions across 3 different sequencers (PRJNA573298, A22, SEX9714436) are pretty straight indication that the originals

Were already contaminated with Human and mouse from the very beginning, and that this contamination is due to dishonesty in the sample handling process which prescribe a spiking of samples in ACE2-HEK293T/A549, VERO E6 and Human lung xenograft mouse.

The “lineages” they claimed to have found aren’t mutational lineages at all—all the mutations they see on these sequences were unique to that specific sequence, and are the result of RNA degradation and from the Taq polymerase errors accumulated from the nested PCR process
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/Sd9IslUCH5 a FCS need a FCS in the inoculum to exist. It can not arise de-novo as it will be destroyed instantly by the immune system.

https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW a fourth Sars-like CoV is live at the WIV. This fourth virus is an infectious clone, where engineering of the S1-S2 is used regularly as mean to generate a culturable virus in HAE cells. No VERO E6 here, and HeLa-hACE2 is the new VERO of the WIV

https://t.co/DtjyycKy1v
https://t.co/PG7LVnHfsy
Even with VERO E6, only half the time does passage lead to the loss of the FCS—smaller plaques need to be explicitly picked for that to be a certainty.

Marburg virus is a novel virus that escaped from the lab. https://t.co/OGQM6qV27l the only reason why it did not become a pandemic is due to it being too lethal to sustain asymptomatic transmission in humans.

The highest reported number of cases were in WuChang right on top of the old WIV headquarters, In contrast to the population density data of Wuhan—note that the place near the market had the highest population density in all of Wuhan, which make it the most optimal location for
@JackDempsey2_2 @pathogenetics @ggronvall

@pathogenetics @ggronvall And 100% of all the alleged market animal photos were taken in 2017.
https://t.co/Vh4dKy6rvI there is a reason why that animal paper refused to release the per-month data of animal sales in the wet markets—the sales were completely banned in 2018 when the consumption of

@pathogenetics @ggronvall Contraband animals were prohibited in an 2017 revision fo the CCP’s own “wildlife protection law”. This targets the main reason for consumption, which is to brag as a social status. No animals or their meat were ever sold in wet markets or online after that date. The only things

@pathogenetics @ggronvall Ever sold after the date were desiccated and sun-dried parts for use in jewelry and for medicine. They are always thoroughly dried out which would inactivate all enveloped viruses incl. all coronaviruses within them if they were present.

@pathogenetics @ggronvall https://t.co/2679qQiA0P
The claimed market origin is undermined by the presence of consistent positive SARS-CoV-2 detection in wastewater and in patient samples outside China in at least two different countries well into November 2019, which is before the first case in the wet

More from All

You May Also Like