So it seems that this article may have prior rejections or have been withdrawn from other journals.
https://t.co/laNmTabCuk
- Timeline of relevant visits to Yunnan for 2012-2015
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) November 28, 2020
- Probable samples from the mineshaft for 2014-2015 (detail and summary) pic.twitter.com/wNf3rWDCtQ
Samples of Laos of Latinne et al. (2020) probably from Luang Namtha (same as what they said in a WIV thesis). Not far from BANAL location
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) September 23, 2021
Wang (2018)
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) November 21, 2021
\u8759\u8760\u65b0\u578b\u03b1\u51a0\u72b6\u75c5\u6bd2\u7684\u53d1\u73b0\u548cSARS\u76f8\u5173\u51a0\u72b6\u75c5\u6bd2\u611f\u67d3\u4eba\u7fa4\u7684\u8840\u6e05\u5b66\u8c03\u67e5
Discovery of novel bat alphacoronaviruses and SARS-related coronavirus serological detection in human.
cc @TheSeeker268 pic.twitter.com/bCWOPyv1J1
the 589 samples of BIGD have some of the typical mistakes an intern would made when doing a manually, repetitive and boring work. But it is specially strange the mistake for the collection date of 7683, 7694, 7700 & 7703 (Jul-14 instead of somewhere between Oct-14 and May-15)
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) July 9, 2020
There was also a sub-trip to Laos border within the 5th visit (80km from TG). Those samples are presented as from Laos in Genbank, and are not present in Bigd.
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) November 28, 2020
But Latinnet et al. (2020) was very clear: "solely from China"https://t.co/f45nzLS7DUhttps://t.co/wqyPJgUE4r pic.twitter.com/ydwZlDTyZS
Other interesting things:
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) February 16, 2021
- 11 Ra samples <500km from the mine, in Laos in 2011
- sometimes they make mistakes mixing decimal and sexagesimal system for GPS coord.
- Some Nanling samples incorrectly geolocated in Kunming (e.g. NL13807) pic.twitter.com/9gavnAm90w
[Thread] FOIA from @USRightToKnow regarding Latinne et al. (2020) and clade 7896
— Francisco de Asis (@franciscodeasis) October 12, 2021
TLDR: No sequence was deleted/modified since Aug-2019, but it seems they wanted to buy time for not publishing the viruses very early in the pandemic.https://t.co/xEssWNv5TY
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
Donald Barr had a way with words. pic.twitter.com/JdRBwXPhJn
— Rudy Havenstein, listening to Nas all day. (@RudyHavenstein) September 17, 2020