✨The philosophy of Charvakas✨

This thread:-
1:- Will give you the basic info about Charvaka philosophy.
2:- will show you similarities between the statements of Charvakas and so called Hindus who have no connection to their roots and still try to term themselves as Dharmic.
We have seen all short of arguments coming out of their mouth you will be amazed by seeing similar arguments dating back to thousands of years . No progress in the field of atheism is made . It is 21st century
Although no book of charvaka philosophy is completely available but there are bits and pieces . Also this philosophy is mentioned in various other books written by our acharyas so that is enough material for a general view .

Now the Philosophy:-
✨About Varna Vyavastha✨
नैव वर्णाश्रमादीनां क्रियाश्च फलदायिका :।
The Karmas related to वर्णाश्रम are not fruitful.

शुद्धिवेशद्वयीशुद्धी पित्रोः पित्रोर्य देकशः । तदानन्तकुलादोषाददोषा जातिरस्ति का ॥
There is no purity of castes , do as you wish instead of following jatidharma
✨About atman and paraloka✨-
The बार्हस्पत्य Sutra states :
चैतन्यविशिष्ट : काय : पुरुष : ( 7 )
The Body filled with chetana is the purusha no seperate entity exist other than this body .
नास्ति परलोक : ( 29 )
There is no परलोक .
शिवलोकादयो मूढैः कल्प्यन्तेऽन्यैः प्रतारकैः ॥
स्वर्गानुभूतिभ्रष्टाष्टियष्टवर्षवधूगमः ।
There is no other swarga and narak other than this earth .The imagination of Shivaloka is done by idiots . Pleasure of women and fine clothes are the Swarga
✨About Brahmanas and the scriptures✨:-
अग्निहोत्रं त्रयो वेदास्त्रिपुण्डूं भस्मगुण्ठनम् । बुद्धिपौरुषहीनानां जीविकेति बृहस्पतिः ॥
Agnihotra , The study of the vedas and applying Bhashma these are the source of livelihood of lazy people
किं वित्तं दत्त तुष्टेयमदातरि हरिप्रिया । Why should one donate money in the form of Dakshinaam to the vessels ?

किं ते वृन्तहृतात्पुष्पात्तन्मात्रे हि फलत्यदः ।
न्यस्य तन्मून्यनन्यस्य न्यास्यमेवाश्मनो यदि ।।
What is the benefit to you by plucking a flower ? Only on tree it results into a fruit . Why are you giving it to the “ idols of stones ” " Wear the flowers on your own head ( Because acc to you God is omnipresent )
About the Rituals:-
स्वपिता यजमानेन तत्र कस्मान्न हिंस्यते ॥
If sacrificial animal attains swarga why not the Yajman kills his own father for swarga ?

गां नतैः कि न तैर्व्यक्तं ततोप्यात्माधरीकृतः you people who are devoted to the animal in the form of cow(are proven inferior)
तृप्तये जायते पुंसो भुक्तमन्येन चेत्ततः ।
दद्याच्छ्राद्धं श्रद्धयान्नं न वहेयुः प्रवासिनः ॥
if श्राद्ध भोजन can satisfy the otherworldly creature , then the son should perform the श्राद्ध at home for his father who has gone to foreign. But He does not seem to be satified
Quoting scriptures or Gods to validate degeneracy but not believing in them:-

As mentioned previously they quote “ Ishvar is omnipresent ” to make fun of murtipuja

Further they say that " Brahma and other Devtas who are worshipped by you , even they didn't rejected the Kama "
परदारनिवृत्तिर्या सोऽयं स्वयमनाहतः ।
अहल्याकेलिलोलेन दम्भो दम्भोलिपाणिना ।।
One should not have intercourse with a woman - this classical order - like conceit was violated by Vajdhari Devraj Indra himself . He had sexual intercourse indirectly with Gautam ' s wife Ahalya .
Charvakas quote " विज्ञानघन एवैतेभ्यो भूतेभ्यः समुत्थाय तान्येवानुविनश्यति न प्रेत्य संज्ञास्ति ( BU २।४।१२ ) to prove that Body is atma .

Similarly they say "Vishnu,shiva used to drink liquor".
Degeneracy and YOLO lifestyle

यावज्जीवेत्सुखं जीवेत् ऋण कृत्वा घृतं पिबेत् । As long as you live , live with pleasure

मांसानि च 14 मत्तकामिन्य : सेव्या : 15 , दिव्यप्रमदादर्शनच्च 16 There is pleasure in eating meat , Having relationship with women , watching beautiful women
ईर्ष्णया रक्षतो नारीर्धिक्कुलस्थिति दाम्भिकान् । स्मरान्धत्वाविशेषेऽपि तथा नरमरक्षतः || Naturally , lust occurs equally in both men and women , but men protect women from the vision of a man because of jealousy but man is free such orthodox system is cursed )
Our philosophies exist since time unknown so you can't say "that we are following such such people based on some common similarities" . But your neo philosophies they are surely influenced by these avedic people.
Books used for reference:- Barhspatya Sutras and Barahspatya अर्थशास्त्र, TatvaSangrah, Sarva siddhant sangraha of Shankracharya, Naishadhiya charita, सर्वदर्शन संग्रह, Prabodh chandroday.
In future, I will provide you the basic refutation of charvaka philosophy . So it will be easy to handle the atheists.

More from All

🌺श्री गरुड़ पुराण - संक्षिप्त वर्णन🌺

हिन्दु धर्म के 18 पुराणों में से एक गरुड़ पुराण का हिन्दु धर्म में बड़ा महत्व है। गरुड़ पुराण में मृत्यु के बाद सद्गती की व्याख्या मिलती है। इस पुराण के अधिष्ठातृ देव भगवान विष्णु हैं, इसलिए ये वैष्णव पुराण है।


गरुड़ पुराण के अनुसार हमारे कर्मों का फल हमें हमारे जीवन-काल में तो मिलता ही है परंतु मृत्यु के बाद भी अच्छे बुरे कार्यों का उनके अनुसार फल मिलता है। इस कारण इस पुराण में निहित ज्ञान को प्राप्त करने के लिए घर के किसी सदस्य की मृत्यु के बाद का समय निर्धारित किया गया है...

..ताकि उस समय हम जीवन-मरण से जुड़े सभी सत्य जान सकें और मृत्यु के कारण बिछडने वाले सदस्य का दुख कम हो सके।
गरुड़ पुराण में विष्णु की भक्ति व अवतारों का विस्तार से उसी प्रकार वर्णन मिलता है जिस प्रकार भगवत पुराण में।आरम्भ में मनु से सृष्टि की उत्पत्ति,ध्रुव चरित्र की कथा मिलती है।


तदुपरांत सुर्य व चंद्र ग्रहों के मंत्र, शिव-पार्वती मंत्र,इन्द्र सम्बंधित मंत्र,सरस्वती मंत्र और नौ शक्तियों के बारे में विस्तार से बताया गया है।
इस पुराण में उन्नीस हज़ार श्लोक बताए जाते हैं और इसे दो भागों में कहा जाता है।
प्रथम भाग में विष्णुभक्ति और पूजा विधियों का उल्लेख है।

मृत्यु के उपरांत गरुड़ पुराण के श्रवण का प्रावधान है ।
पुराण के द्वितीय भाग में 'प्रेतकल्प' का विस्तार से वर्णन और नरकों में जीव के पड़ने का वृत्तांत मिलता है। मरने के बाद मनुष्य की क्या गति होती है, उसका किस प्रकार की योनियों में जन्म होता है, प्रेत योनि से मुक्ति के उपाय...

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
This is NONSENSE. The people who take photos with their books on instagram are known to be voracious readers who graciously take time to review books and recommend them to their followers. Part of their medium is to take elaborate, beautiful photos of books. Die mad, Guardian.


THEY DO READ THEM, YOU JUDGY, RACOON-PICKED TRASH BIN


If you come for Bookstagram, i will fight you.

In appreciation, here are some of my favourite bookstagrams of my books: (photos by lit_nerd37, mybookacademy, bookswrotemystory, and scorpio_books)