𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗟𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗞 𝗣𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗦 !📊
~𝙰 𝚃𝚑𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍~🧵
𝙿𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚁𝚎-𝚃𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚝 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚑 🤞
@ProdigalTrader @SouravSenguptaI @PAlearner @Puretechnicals9 @caniravkaria @MrigankPuri @nison_steve @chartmojo
𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻: The opening price.
𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵: The highest price over a specific time period.
𝗟𝗼𝘄: The lowest price over a specific time period.
𝗖𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲: The closing price.
Here’s an example:
𝐂𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐋𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐊 𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐓𝐒𝐇𝐄𝐄𝐓:
A Marubuzo indicates that there is so much buying/selling interest in a stock that the market participants were willing to buy/sell the stock at every price point during the day, so much so that the stock closed near its high/low point for the day.
This means the open and close prices are equal. Doji’s provide crucial information about the market sentiments and is an important candlestick pattern.
The bullish hammer is a significant candlestick pattern that occurs at the bottom of the trend. A hammer consists of small real body at the upper end of the trading range with a long lower shadow. The longer the lower shadow the more bullish it is.
The shooting star is a top reversal pattern. A shooting star signals a market high. Since the shooting star is seen after a high, the pattern signals selling pressure.
𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝟭: 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲?
Well, if the price closed the near highs of the range, that tells you the buyers are in control. But, if the price closed near the lows of the range and shows rejection of higher prices, it shows that sellers are in control.
This question will help you determine if there’s any
strength (or conviction) behind the move.
And, please point out if there is any mistake on my end. Would love to hear each and everyone's views.
If you liked reading this then please Re-Tweet the first tweet in this thread and follow @sarosij_ghosh for more stuff on trading & investing. 😇🙏
More from All
You May Also Like
🌿𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 : 𝑫𝒉𝒓𝒖𝒗𝒂 & 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒉𝒏𝒖
Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W
Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela
The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.
One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.
Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"
Once upon a time there was a Raja named Uttānapāda born of Svayambhuva Manu,1st man on earth.He had 2 beautiful wives - Suniti & Suruchi & two sons were born of them Dhruva & Uttama respectively.
#talesofkrishna https://t.co/E85MTPkF9W
Prabhu says i reside in the heart of my bhakt.
— Right Singh (@rightwingchora) December 21, 2020
Guess the event. pic.twitter.com/yFUmbfe5KL
Now Suniti was the daughter of a tribal chief while Suruchi was the daughter of a rich king. Hence Suruchi was always favored the most by Raja while Suniti was ignored. But while Suniti was gentle & kind hearted by nature Suruchi was venomous inside.
#KrishnaLeela
The story is of a time when ideally the eldest son of the king becomes the heir to the throne. Hence the sinhasan of the Raja belonged to Dhruva.This is why Suruchi who was the 2nd wife nourished poison in her heart for Dhruva as she knew her son will never get the throne.
One day when Dhruva was just 5 years old he went on to sit on his father's lap. Suruchi, the jealous queen, got enraged and shoved him away from Raja as she never wanted Raja to shower Dhruva with his fatherly affection.
Dhruva protested questioning his step mother "why can't i sit on my own father's lap?" A furious Suruchi berated him saying "only God can allow him that privilege. Go ask him"
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
