1. Crisp, relevant to their role, personalized
2. Relevance + calling out a PAIN POINT
3. How other people EXACTLY like them are solving the SAME pain point
4. How THEY will benefit
5. Question CTA to gauge interest
The EXACT script that got a positive response from a $1B+ company - Blue Origin
(Bezos’ Space Travel company 🚀)
In just ONE week of outreach
[THREAD]
1. Crisp, relevant to their role, personalized
2. Relevance + calling out a PAIN POINT
3. How other people EXACTLY like them are solving the SAME pain point
4. How THEY will benefit
5. Question CTA to gauge interest
How to write a good opening?
Make it relevant and a genuine compliment. Can go the Personalized lines route that @blackhatwizardd taught in CEM
Or, you can simply find bits of information that would apply to batches of your prospects.
this is what we did
The second sentence of your email needs to answer:
Why is he emailing ME?
Is this worth reading?
And it needs to do it in as few words as possible
- Call out your prospect (by profession, title, role)
- Put a finger on their PAIN - something they struggle with on a day-to-day basis
- Ask a question
@blackhatwizardd taught this
But many doing it wrong
You need to show how other people EXACTLY like your prospect are solving the EXACT same problem using your UNIQUE method
Read that again.
All the words in uppercase are that way for a reason
But how do I create a unique method? I'm only offering SEO...
Here's how
Give a unique spin to what you do
NOT "we’ll do seo to rank you on google"
INSTEAD
"we’ll use data-backed keyword prioritization to get you organic traffic that converts"
embed direct benefit in your offer
even better if its a $$ amount
More from All
ChatGPT is a phenomenal AI Tool.
But don't limit yourself to just ChatGPT.
Here're 8 AI-powered tools you should try in 2023:
1. KaiberAI
@KaiberAI helps you generate beautiful videos in minutes.
Transform your ideas into the visual stories of your dreams with this Amazing Tool.
New features:
1. Upload your custom music
2. Prompt Templates
3. Camera Movements:
Check here
https://t.co/ivnDRf628L
2. @tldview TLDV
Best ChatGPT Alternative for meetings.
Make your meetings 10X more productive with this amazing tool.
Try it now:
https://t.co/vOy3sS4QfJ
3. ComposeAI
Use ComposeAI for generating any text using AI.
It’s will help you write better content in seconds.
Try it here:
https://t.co/ksj5aop5ZI
4. Browser AI
Use this AI tool to extract and monitor data from any website.
Train a robot in 2 minutes to do your work.
No coding required.
https://t.co/nNiawtUMyO
But don't limit yourself to just ChatGPT.
Here're 8 AI-powered tools you should try in 2023:
1. KaiberAI
@KaiberAI helps you generate beautiful videos in minutes.
Transform your ideas into the visual stories of your dreams with this Amazing Tool.
New features:
1. Upload your custom music
2. Prompt Templates
3. Camera Movements:
Check here
https://t.co/ivnDRf628L
2. @tldview TLDV
Best ChatGPT Alternative for meetings.
Make your meetings 10X more productive with this amazing tool.
Try it now:
https://t.co/vOy3sS4QfJ
3. ComposeAI
Use ComposeAI for generating any text using AI.
It’s will help you write better content in seconds.
Try it here:
https://t.co/ksj5aop5ZI
4. Browser AI
Use this AI tool to extract and monitor data from any website.
Train a robot in 2 minutes to do your work.
No coding required.
https://t.co/nNiawtUMyO
You May Also Like
1/ Here’s a list of conversational frameworks I’ve picked up that have been helpful.
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”
“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”
4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:
“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”
“What’s end-game here?”
“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
“What would the best version of yourself do”?
Please add your own.
2/ The Magic Question: "What would need to be true for you
1/\u201cWhat would need to be true for you to\u2026.X\u201d
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) December 4, 2018
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody: https://t.co/Yo6jHbSit9
3/ On evaluating where someone’s head is at regarding a topic they are being wishy-washy about or delaying.
“Gun to the head—what would you decide now?”
“Fast forward 6 months after your sabbatical--how would you decide: what criteria is most important to you?”
4/ Other Q’s re: decisions:
“Putting aside a list of pros/cons, what’s the *one* reason you’re doing this?” “Why is that the most important reason?”
“What’s end-game here?”
“What does success look like in a world where you pick that path?”
5/ When listening, after empathizing, and wanting to help them make their own decisions without imposing your world view:
“What would the best version of yourself do”?
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".