My recommendations to start with machine learning math:
• Statistics 110: Probability — Harvard University
• Essence of Linear Algebra — 3Blue1Brown
• Multivariate Calculus — Coursera
Links and 3 additional free resources here: https://t.co/fEmpmRKEvJ

More from Santiago
Free machine learning education.
Many top universities are making their Machine Learning and Deep Learning programs publicly available. All of this information is now online and free for everyone!
Here are 6 of these programs. Pick one and get started!
↓
Introduction to Deep Learning
MIT Course 6.S191
Alexander Amini and Ava Soleimany
Introductory course on deep learning methods and practical experience using TensorFlow. Covers applications to computer vision, natural language processing, and more.
https://t.co/Uxx97WPCfR
Deep Learning
NYU DS-GA 1008
Yann LeCun and Alfredo Canziani
This course covers the latest techniques in deep learning and representation learning with applications to computer vision, natural language understanding, and speech recognition.
https://t.co/cKzpDOBVl1
Designing, Visualizing, and Understanding Deep Neural Networks
UC Berkeley CS L182
John Canny
A theoretical course focusing on design principles and best practices to design deep neural networks.
https://t.co/1TFUAIrAKb
Applied Machine Learning
Cornell Tech CS 5787
Volodymyr Kuleshov
A machine learning introductory course that starts from the very basics, covering all of the most important machine learning algorithms and how to apply them in practice.
https://t.co/hD5no8Pdfa
Many top universities are making their Machine Learning and Deep Learning programs publicly available. All of this information is now online and free for everyone!
Here are 6 of these programs. Pick one and get started!
↓

Introduction to Deep Learning
MIT Course 6.S191
Alexander Amini and Ava Soleimany
Introductory course on deep learning methods and practical experience using TensorFlow. Covers applications to computer vision, natural language processing, and more.
https://t.co/Uxx97WPCfR

Deep Learning
NYU DS-GA 1008
Yann LeCun and Alfredo Canziani
This course covers the latest techniques in deep learning and representation learning with applications to computer vision, natural language understanding, and speech recognition.
https://t.co/cKzpDOBVl1

Designing, Visualizing, and Understanding Deep Neural Networks
UC Berkeley CS L182
John Canny
A theoretical course focusing on design principles and best practices to design deep neural networks.
https://t.co/1TFUAIrAKb

Applied Machine Learning
Cornell Tech CS 5787
Volodymyr Kuleshov
A machine learning introductory course that starts from the very basics, covering all of the most important machine learning algorithms and how to apply them in practice.
https://t.co/hD5no8Pdfa

More from All
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the

chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?