1/n
Revolution, Digital Gold, Ponzi, Scam..
“Bitcoin” – almost everyone has an opinion on it! Bitcoin, along with other coins in Crypto Land, have seen a steep correction in last few days.
Let's use this fall to simplify and de-jargonize the complicated world of Bitcoin.
Thread 🧵
1/n
Bookmark this visual comic form explanation of the whitepaper: https://t.co/6gEHGVV8UM
2/n
For both storing your money and for every transaction involving transfer of value, a financial intermediary or an administrator has been necessary before this. Such as Central Bank for Banking, SEC for securities, etc.
3/n
That isn’t how Satoshi Nakamoto looks :)
Nobody knows how he looks. Nobody knows if such a person even exists. In words, no one knows who owns Bitcoin. This has been fodder for conspiracy theories.
4/n
5/n
Before today's carnage, the total market capitalization of Crypto stood at ~$ 2 Trillion, with Bitcoin contributing c. half of it, although its weight in overall Crypto has been declining.
Check: https://t.co/Ca2PiJbTQR
6/n
As Dalio puts it - "Bitcoin is one hell of an invention. To have invented a new type of money via a system programmed into a computer & being able to scale like that in 10 years!"
This chart via JPM shows the ascent of BTC. Fascinating.
7/n
As per traditional finance, money has 3 purposes. It serves as:
✍️A medium of exchange
✍️A store of value
✍️A unit of account
The utility of BTC & Cryptos has been debated on all 2 parameters.
8/n
While the many critics of Bitcoin have challenged the idea that it can never serve as money, experts now agree on on it's utility as a store of value. The current debate is around medium of exchange due to the volatility.
To its many critics, Bitcoin has always asked back:
Where are we today?
To quote Twitter: "Bitcoin is inevitable":
✅Increasing use cases, leading to DeFi
✅A strong cult (seen the laser eyes?)
✅Early institutional adoption (Mastercard, Visa, PayPal, Tesla, Blackrock etc)
✅Stronger payment ecosystem
But there is a catch:
Of the many debated aspects, the one that is proving to be Bitcoin (and Crypto's) nemesis is energy inefficiency.
"Bitcoin consumes more electricity than Argentina". This headline caught the world's fancy in Feb '21 & it's been a topsy turvy terrain since, leading to this:
As we speak, BTC is down from its peak of ~$64,870 to $40,010 (recovered from intra day low of $30,202). But if one zooms out, it's still a phenomenal rally.
And this not the first correction.
It fell from its peak of $19K in Dec'17
to ~$10K in Feb '18, to ~$3K early 2019.
Let's discuss some lesser talked aspects:
A. Increased retail participation:
Rapid growth in new a/c openings on crypto exchanges. Chart shows unique crypto wallet accounts on https://t.co/5jhnEfoATp. Sharp upticks during FOMO rallies in end 17, mid-2019 & since Nov '20.
B. Increase in balances held in accounts between 1,000 and 10,000 BTCs, likely to be institutionally driven.
Interestingly, balances held in accounts with more
than 10,000 BTCs have declined significantly,
suggesting potential cashing out by early investors and miners.
C. Debate on volatility:
Despite the raging debate, data shows that Bitcoin's volatility has not trended lower over the
past several years. Tt remains about 4 times more volatile than Equities or Gold.
This has been a big impediment in its utility as a medium of exchange.
D. Constraints on liquidity
Lack of legal tender status will constrain
cryptocurrency liquidity compared to traditional portfolio hedges such as Commodities (Gold), Currency, Bonds or real estate.
JPM observes that a "large majority of this liquidity provision comes from high frequency-style traders who often end up fleeing when volatility picks up."
This explains the steep swings (such as now) and are tail risks that should be understood by more crypto enthusiasts.
E. Regulatory risks:
Citi in a report "BITCOIN - At the Tipping Point" opines:
"Despite most ardent wishes, it might prove almost impossible for a government to shut access to BTC or prevent its ownership or usage w/out effectively causing shutdown of the global Internet."
More from All
Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...
... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9
Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x
Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq
He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...
... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:
Ivor Cummins BE (Chem) is a former R&D Manager at HP (sourcre: https://t.co/Wbf5scf7gn), turned Content Creator/Podcast Host/YouTube personality. (Call it what you will.)
— Steve (@braidedmanga) November 17, 2020
Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.
Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9
Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."
I wonder why...
Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x
Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.
Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq
1. Mini Thread on Conflicts of Interest involving the authors of the Nature Toilet Paper:
https://t.co/VUYbsKGncx
Kristian G. Andersen
Andrew Rambaut
Ian Lipkin
Edward C. Holmes
Robert F. Garry
2. Thanks to @newboxer007 for forwarding the link to the research by an Australian in Taiwan (not on
3. K.Andersen didn't mention "competing interests"
Only Garry listed Zalgen Labs, which we will look at later.
In acknowledgements, Michael Farzan, Wellcome Trust, NIH, ERC & ARC are mentioned.
Author affiliations listed as usual.
Note the 328 Citations!
https://t.co/nmOeohM89Q
4. Kristian Andersen (1)
Andersen worked with USAMRIID & Fort Detrick scientists on research, with Robert Garry, Jens Kuhn & Sina Bavari among
5. Kristian Andersen (2)
Works at Scripps Research Institute, which WAS in serious financial trouble, haemorrhaging 20 million $ a year.
But just when the first virus cases were emerging, they received great news.
They issued a press release dated November 27, 2019:
https://t.co/VUYbsKGncx
Kristian G. Andersen
Andrew Rambaut
Ian Lipkin
Edward C. Holmes
Robert F. Garry
2. Thanks to @newboxer007 for forwarding the link to the research by an Australian in Taiwan (not on
3. K.Andersen didn't mention "competing interests"
Only Garry listed Zalgen Labs, which we will look at later.
In acknowledgements, Michael Farzan, Wellcome Trust, NIH, ERC & ARC are mentioned.
Author affiliations listed as usual.
Note the 328 Citations!
https://t.co/nmOeohM89Q
4. Kristian Andersen (1)
Andersen worked with USAMRIID & Fort Detrick scientists on research, with Robert Garry, Jens Kuhn & Sina Bavari among
Our Hans Kristian Andersen working with Jens H. Kuhn, Sina Bavari, Robert F. Garry, Stuart T. Nichol,Gustavo Palacios, Sheli R. Radoshitzky from USAMRIID and Fort Detrick to tell more fairy tales? Full emails listed for queries...https://t.co/kLRoQTxiGD pic.twitter.com/uHNuGraPP2
— Billy Bostickson \U0001f3f4\U0001f441&\U0001f441 \U0001f193 (@BillyBostickson) August 26, 2020
5. Kristian Andersen (2)
Works at Scripps Research Institute, which WAS in serious financial trouble, haemorrhaging 20 million $ a year.
But just when the first virus cases were emerging, they received great news.
They issued a press release dated November 27, 2019:
You May Also Like
H was always unseen in S2NL :)
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Sir, Log yahan.. 13 days patience nhi rakh sakte aur aap 2013 ki baat kar rahe ho. Even Aap Ready made portfolio banakar bhi de do to bhi wo 1 month me hi EXIT kar denge \U0001f602
— BhavinKhengarSuratGujarat (@IntradayWithBRK) September 19, 2021
Neuland 2700 se 1500 & Sequent 330 to 230 kya huwa.. 99% retailers/investors twitter par charcha n EXIT\U0001f602