Are You Making These Costly Beginner Mistakes With Your Sales Letters?

*** Thread ***

Pssst... if you sell anything on Gumroad...

You might wanna pay attention to this 👇

I usually focus on email...

But I've been busy critiquing sales letters this past week.

Instead of getting in the weeds...

Let's zoom out and talk about 5 high-level areas that can help you boost those juicy conversions.
#1 — Weak structure

I want to see how the sales letter flows.

How are we organizing the sections?

Do we even HAVE sections?

What about section headers for skimmers?

We want to take the reader through a logical sequence that primes them to buy.
#2 — Fuzzy targeting

WHO is our ideal client or customer?

Are we speaking to this person... or trying to appeal to everyone?

A common, common mistake I see is that the offer owner isn't clear on the target.

Instead, write to ONE person.
#3 — Incomplete offer

Many people will create a book, course, or coaching program...

Slap a price on it...

And call it a day.

They don't really give thought to offer positioning, bonuses, one-time offers, upsells, ascension, urgency, etc.
We want to solve a SPECIFIC problem...

Offer a SPECIFIC solution...

Talk about WHY they haven't been able to solve this problem...

And highlight what makes our entire offer stack UNIQUE.
#4 — No FAQ

I know some people may disagree...

But I like to have an FAQ for the people who jump straight to the bottom of the sales page (like me).

This is a good opportunity to recap the offer...

Overcome objections...

Set expectations...

And tell the reader how to buy.
#5 — No background story

People want to know who created this product.

Who are you?

And why did you create THIS particular product?

A good story will help you break down buying resistance...

And build a bond with your reader.

It's also an opportunity to build trust.
This is high-level stuff.

Nothing earth-shattering if you're writing sales letters for Agora.

But for people just getting their feet wet with sales letters...

Like coaches and course creators writing their own copy...

These are some key ingredients you'll want to include.
Enjoyed this thread?

5x a week I write a newsletter for 2,000 subscribers about email marketing + online business.

Readers include millionaires, small biz owners, copywriters, and top freelancers.

Join here:

https://t.co/WturMkgI6l

More from All

The best morning routine?

Starts the night before.

9 evening habits that make all the difference:

1. Write down tomorrow's 3:3:3 plan

• 3 hours on your most important project
• 3 shorter tasks
• 3 maintenance activities

Defining a "productive day" is crucial.

Or else you'll never be at peace (even with excellent output).

Learn more


2. End the workday with a shutdown ritual

Create a short shutdown ritual (hat-tip to Cal Newport). Close your laptop, plug in the charger, spend 2 minutes tidying your desk. Then say, "shutdown."

Separating your life and work is key.

3. Journal 1 beautiful life moment

Delicious tacos, presentation you crushed, a moment of inner peace. Write it down.

Gratitude programs a mindset of abundance.

4. Lay out clothes

Get exercise clothes ready for tomorrow. Upon waking up, jump rope for 2 mins. It will activate your mind + body.

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?