10 ways I am running my current startup differently from the ones before

A thread...

Difference #1
Bootstrapped as against raising money

https://t.co/RKWB3KfMZt was a venture funded company. We raised $43Mn from top investors, but I couldn’t give them a return that I would be proud of. In the process, learning how raising money works but also doesn’t work
My current startup is bootstrapped.
I do not intend to raise money for it.
It has been profitable from Day 1 and that is the way I hope it remains.

I have raised money from customers.
Difference #2
Slow and small

For the past decade, I was in the mode of fast and big.
Being fast was the only thing that mattered.
And you either go big or go home.
Today, I am taking it slow.
Slow to add costs, slow to take decisions that are irreversible.

I am patient because all good things in life take time!
Difference #3
No cofounders

nearbuy had 6 founders. All smart people, but different people. And my leadership style was not suited to handle those differences. I didn’t confront, my feedback was often sugar coated and tough decisions were late. The company suffered because of me
This time around I am doing it alone. I love that I am 100% accountable for all setbacks and can still share our success with the team.

People are not confused, nor am I.
Difference #4
Intern first and then full time

At nearbuy we started with an enviable leadership team. And added people. Lots of people.
Because I was in a hurry.
To grow fast.
To grow big.
This time around, I am hiring slow.
I have a team of 11 interns, 6 of whom have been there with me for a year now.
And next time is when 1 of them starts fullt-time.
We have got to know each other, have grown together.
And I love that we took this time together to evaluate.
Difference #5
No ESOPs. Profit Sharing instead

At nearbuy, we gave ESOPs to everyone.
But the ESOPs didn’t mean anything if they were never liquidated.
All of us, including me, have paper wealth that hasn’t translated into actual money.
In my new startup, I have no ESOP plan.
10% of the net profit every quarter, is distributed within the team.
So we keep ourselves accountable to make profits.
Everyone gets cash, which they use as per their needs.
And I do not bear the burden of converting their equity into cash
Difference #6
Only build what you are good at

At nearbuy, we built everything in-house.
Because we had unique internal processes and had a kickass tech team, the decision to buy was always shot down.
Build everything!
Today, I am only building what the core product is.
EVERYTHING else is either outsourced, or managed by software.
From day 1, my software bill was higher than my payroll.
Working with experts across the globe.
Riding on what they do best, while I focus on mine.
Difference #7
I call the shots

My natural leadership style is that of extreme autonomy.
Which doesn’t work in the early stages of a startup.

When things are so uncertain, it requires one voice to call the shot.
Not have people interpret every situation differently.
I made that change this time around.
I take the calls. The strategic decisions are my responsibility.

Once taken, the team brings in their ability to execute.
We play to our strengths
Difference #8
100% remote

We built the nearbuy office as I would build my own home.
It was my favorite space.
Where we all came together and felt that we all belong.
It was collaborative, brought the best in people and made them all feel respected.
But I realized that to grow slow and to be deliberate, I had to drop the idea of an office.

This was even before COVID struck.
Today the team is spread across the country: Jaipur, Jodhpur, Indore, Kolkata, Delhi, Pune, Bhubaneswar, Bangalore
Most of us have never met each other
Difference #9
100% transparent

This was something that I always wanted but could not achieve at nearbuy.
Bring in 100% transparency.
The company financials, everyone’s salary, the basis of that, everything should be known.

No one should wield any power because of what they know
So that is how I have done it.
Every quarter, the company financials are shared with the team.
Everyone’s salary is known to everyone else.
There is nothing hidden.
I want people to focus on their work and their growth.
Not in uncovering secrets!
Difference #10
There is no goal

At nearbuy, we set goals every year, every quarter.
When we hit them we celebrated.
When we didn’t we reflected.
But hand on heart, was there a basis for setting those goals?
No!
I have no goals for my startup.
We have signed up for a WHY, and a process.
And we will stay true to the WHY and the process.
Time will tell us where this takes us.

Set habits. Not goals!
While these differences exist, some things core to me haven’t changed.

1. I still hire culture-first, without looking at the resume until much later.

2. I still believe in respect as the core tenet of the organization.
3. I believe in offering perks and privileges to the team that make their life easy and enjoyable.

4. And I still speak to several customers everyday!
The last decade has been peak growth for me.
I have learnt so much about myself and what drives people.
I have realized how I help others and how I am unable to.
So when I stepped down as the CEO of nearbuy, I reflected upon my failures, my mistakes and my shortcomings.
I wanted to be true to the person I had become.

I had changed as a person, as a leader and I did not want the world’s image of who I was to dictate who I would be.
I love this journey I am on.
There is nothing to prove, nothing to show, nowhere to reach, and no one to please.

I am responsible for 3 people and no one else.
My customers, my team and my self.
These differences represent how I have come to know of myself now.
I am a different me, today.
And my startup is a reflection of who I am!
As it should always be.

More from Ankur Warikoo

More from All

कुंडली में 12 भाव होते हैं। कैसे ज्योतिष द्वारा रोग के आंकलन करते समय कुंडली के विभिन्न भावों से गणना करते हैं आज इस पर चर्चा करेंगे।
कुण्डली को कालपुरुष की संज्ञा देकर इसमें शरीर के अंगों को स्थापित कर उनसे रोग, रोगेश, रोग को बढ़ाने घटाने वाले ग्रह


रोग की स्थिति में उत्प्रेरक का कार्य करने वाले ग्रह, आयुर्वेदिक/ऐलोपैथी/होमियोपैथी में से कौन कारगर होगा इसका आँकलन, रक्त विकार, रक्त और आपरेशन की स्थिति, कौन सा आंतरिक या बाहरी अंग प्रभावित होगा इत्यादि गणना करने में कुंडली का प्रयोग किया जाता है।


मेडिकल ज्योतिष में आज के समय में Dr. K. S. Charak का नाम निर्विवाद रूप से प्रथम स्थान रखता है। उनकी लिखी कई पुस्तकें आज इस क्षेत्र में नए ज्योतिषों का मार्गदर्शन कर रही हैं।
प्रथम भाव -
इस भाव से हम व्यक्ति की रोगप्रतिरोधक क्षमता, सिर, मष्तिस्क का विचार करते हैं।


द्वितीय भाव-
दाहिना नेत्र, मुख, वाणी, नाक, गर्दन व गले के ऊपरी भाग का विचार होता है।
तृतीय भाव-
अस्थि, गला,कान, हाथ, कंधे व छाती के आंतरिक अंगों का शुरुआती भाग इत्यादि।

चतुर्थ भाव- छाती व इसके आंतरिक अंग, जातक की मानसिक स्थिति/प्रकृति, स्तन आदि की गणना की जाती है


पंचम भाव-
जातक की बुद्धि व उसकी तीव्रता,पीठ, पसलियां,पेट, हृदय की स्थिति आंकलन में प्रयोग होता है।

षष्ठ भाव-
रोग भाव कहा जाता है। कुंडली मे इसके तत्कालिक भाव स्वामी, कालपुरुष कुंडली के स्वामी, दृष्टि संबंध, रोगेश की स्थिति, रोगेश के नक्षत्र औऱ रोगेश व भाव की डिग्री इत्यादि।
How can we use language supervision to learn better visual representations for robotics?

Introducing Voltron: Language-Driven Representation Learning for Robotics!

Paper: https://t.co/gIsRPtSjKz
Models: https://t.co/NOB3cpATYG
Evaluation: https://t.co/aOzQu95J8z

🧵👇(1 / 12)


Videos of humans performing everyday tasks (Something-Something-v2, Ego4D) offer a rich and diverse resource for learning representations for robotic manipulation.

Yet, an underused part of these datasets are the rich, natural language annotations accompanying each video. (2/12)

The Voltron framework offers a simple way to use language supervision to shape representation learning, building off of prior work in representations for robotics like MVP (
https://t.co/Pb0mk9hb4i) and R3M (https://t.co/o2Fkc3fP0e).

The secret is *balance* (3/12)

Starting with a masked autoencoder over frames from these video clips, make a choice:

1) Condition on language and improve our ability to reconstruct the scene.

2) Generate language given the visual representation and improve our ability to describe what's happening. (4/12)

By trading off *conditioning* and *generation* we show that we can learn 1) better representations than prior methods, and 2) explicitly shape the balance of low and high-level features captured.

Why is the ability to shape this balance important? (5/12)

You May Also Like