Alex1Powell Categories For later read
#Moduloft The Concept. #Cop26 Draft No.1 Presentation and discussion #BuildBackBetter #LevellingUp
https://t.co/83Lcp66ySk
#Moduloft #AffordableHousingFinance #TheBestMove
Affordable Homes, Are we Looking for a Solution? If so heres where to look!
https://t.co/TFmLjdJWF8 via @yumpu_com Affordable Homes, Are we Looking for a Solution? If so heres where to look! #Moduloft #AffordableHousingFinance #TheBestMove
https://t.co/YUGr2H0HGl
Affordable Homes, Are we Looking for a Solution? If so heres where to look! #Moduloft #AffordableHousingFinance #TheBestMove
https://t.co/qhAB3TOQHo
Affordable Homes, Are we Looking for a Solution? If so heres where to look! #Moduloft #AffordableHousingFinance #TheBestMove
My latest (as ever, I don't write headlines).
— Steven Barrett (@SBarrettBar) December 10, 2020
It's important people try to explain what sovereignty is and why we are where we are. If you like elephants, read my explanation.https://t.co/mhh7Sjk6Er
Very large numbers of international treaties require the UK to make, or not make, law. The UN Treaty requires us to impose sanctions. The Antarctic Treaty requires us to prohibit unlicensed operators organising tours to Antarctica. GATT restricts our ability to set tariffs.
appears to think that such provisions do not infringe his definition of “sovereignty”, but he fails to explain why not.
He asserts, without explaining why, that a level playing field term would infringe “sovereignty”. But the LPF terms being discussed simply set out actions that the EU is able to take if the UK legislates (or does not legislate) in certain ways.
Why is that different in legal principle from WTO rules that (for example) allow other states to impose high tariffs on our widget industry if we exercise our sovereign freedom to pass laws that exempt widget-making from UK tax?
I say this on my tours, we 'know' very little. In fact, we know nothing. I don't know is honest!! It's humble, and its real.
In Egypt there's too much to know, so 'we don't know' is the truest statement there is. https://t.co/IajqsQGdJ8
Another reminder to relax and trust the journey. Become comfortable saying "I don't know."
— \U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8I Support Our Military & Law Enforcement\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@TheWiseOwl_AZ) December 11, 2020
https://t.co/jXtMo6tFMK
https://t.co/6d9OC6NhPi
https://t.co/KxfexudiGL
https://t.co/tvi7MusmEd
-Continuing Resolution (CR) is a mechanism to address a budgetary “gap”
Under @senatemajldr (not) awesome leadership CRs have become the norm, which is maddening because that’s NOT what CRs are meant for
-pocket veto
-veto
-President versus Congress
#Evergreen
— File411 (@File411) December 25, 2020
did you think I was randomly screaming (sometimes I do) but this thread, I walked you through some of the programs which would run out of Funding
You let me know if @realDonaldTrump isn\u2018t a petulant selfish sociopath
He does not give 1 F...https://t.co/mgLnAvrovs
Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution
-any Bill shall not be returned by the President within 10 Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment
Sorry here’s the link - Article 1, Section 7 of our Constitution (sometimes referred to as the presentment clause)
One could infer “pocket veto” +/- 2 days Jan 4th, 5th, or 6th...
https://t.co/8xrbnNLn1V
My educated guess is Trump knows
“might” (operative word) be his “trust the plan” screwing McConnell Senate GOP & nearly ALL Americans
-though lacking a signature and formal objections
-does not become law
-Pocket vetoes are not subject to the congressional veto override process
And here‘s WHY - it is literally the last sentence:
“...unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law”
the massive bill was flown down to FL yesterday so the 10 day clock started yesterday...
https://t.co/8xrbnNLn1V
\U0001f4a5INdiGO ASCenSiON\U0001f4a5..........................................................\U0001f4a5
— SPACEX (@SPACEX25587506) December 29, 2020
\U0001f4a5.......................................................\U0001f4a5..................\U0001f4a5... ...... .........\u267e pic.twitter.com/dW24cc8ruv
https://t.co/ZbgjDhcpan
https://t.co/upLLPuIKSa
God walks amongst us
https://t.co/kSibLgVNDk
2/ Young people have been neglected and they are suffering see https://t.co/btxlm8CSZG for more information.
3/ The main reason for https://t.co/btxlm8CSZG (and an Open Letter I organised to Gavin Williamson in the summer to urge him to open schools) is to urge the government to take children into account when making decisions.
4/ Government are still not doing this – see recent articles from me
5/ So, we parents must protect our children. The single biggest thing we can do to stop this crisis is to refuse mass testing which is driving damaging restrictive policies: