A few half-baked thoughts on Laschet and Syria and some such.

First off, it's revolting to see any mainstream politician spread what appear to be conspiracy theories about atrocities committed by the Assad regime in the Syrian war. In fact, to *volunteer* them. Unprompted. /1

I stopped counting the dozens of friends, colleagues, officials from around the world, but in particular, the Middle East, who have sent me his tweets over the past week. The common response from Berlin appears to be an uncomfortable "well, he's not a foreign policy guy..." /2
But he is! I think it's easy to underestimate the man and his jovial, slightly pudgy and self-deprecating persona. There's also a tendency in Berlin and outside to confuse regional politics (and accents!) for provincialism. But Laschet is from Aachen - in the heart of Europe. /3
His first job in politics was with Hans Stercken, then-chairman of the Bundestag's foreign affairs committee, in the tumultuous mid-late 80s. As a new member of Bundestag in 1994, he joined the committees for int development, EU affairs, and foreign affairs (as an alternate). /4
Some headlines refer to him as a "Merkel-loyalist". At least when I flipped thru his record from the 90s, I got a sense of a man with profound convictions: A passionate European. But also an early proponent of CDU-Greens rapprochement based on a shared moralistic worldview. /5
A telling instance may be the 1995 Velayati-affair, when Laschet and a group of CDU parliamentarians defected to join a Green motion calling on foreign minister Kinkel to rescind an invitation to the then-Iranian foreign minister who had praised the assassination of Rabin. /6
That one almost led to the resignation of foreign minister Kinkel and was, pardon my French, politically ballsy (a number of now-known faces were part of that one!). And again, apparently grounded in a well-considered, moral reading of international politics. /7
He subsequently joined the European parliament, where he specializes in foreign and security affairs with, judging from his various speeches on the matter, an apparent emphasis on the Middle East and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I read them, they are informed, considered. /8
All that to say, he's not bumbling out of line or character to tweet at John Kerry. So what's with his views? A number of comments note his apparent tolerance for Assad, Putin and Xi. I'll leave the latter as general German proclivities. His stated position on Syria however... /9
... puts him very much outside the mainstream of German and CDU politics. It's also apparently hard to square with his reputation as a staunch defender of Merkel's welcoming refugee policy (e.g. yesterday Turkey's Anadolu Agency called him the "pro-migrant candidate"). /10
And again, he's been consistent: He vocally protested Germany's political and material support for opposition factions starting in 2013 and subsequently, in various ways, recommended the West align with Assad and Russia in what he considers the common fight against Islamists. /11
In my reading, and I know this may be controversial so please don't yell at me, the answer may lie in his abiding Catholicism. Laschet (as well as his key advisor) is a genuine believer, a former editor-in-chief of the local Church paper, deeply embedded in these networks. /12
If you check his remarks, he invariably justifies his position in terms of concern for the fates of the region's Christians or "religious diversity" - be it Syrian clergy or Egypt's Coptic minority (he referred to Sisi's bloody 2013 coup as the country's "Second Revolution"). /13
(As a quick aside: I think the Curia's role in Syria, and its attempt to shape Europe's perception and response to the crisis, remains very much understudied and underappreciated. Germany's Catholics are famously independently minded, but these networks nonetheless run deep.) /14
Anyhow! The fact that he was willing to voice these views out of turn and against prevailing sentiment suggests, to me, a little more than passing error of judgement. This is a genuinely-held concern consistent with his worldview. But then why the crude and crank conspiracy? /15
Unfortunately, that part's just Germany for you! Look no further than mainstream news and debate programs or non-fiction bestseller lists for real whoppers. Not just Lüders and Todenhöfer, but respectable ageing correspondents, former diplomats painting with broad brushes. /16
So finally: What's the risk assessment? As many have pointed out: This is just one of many facets of Laschet - the dedicated European and staunch Transatlanticist who apparently also sees little upside in confrontation with Putin or the CCP. Maybe we'll learn more soon or ... /17
... maybe we won't! Because apparently, as has been pointed out, hardly anyone really cares. Germans, by and large (and justifiably!), feel safe and sound and foreign policy simply is not a hot-button issue, neither in the leadership race nor national politics generally. /19
He also still has quite a road ahead: He's the presumptive favourite for the CDU nomination - and he'll try! - but there are others, with higher approval ratings, waiting in the wings. Finally, even if successful, there await constraints of coalition (and cabinet) government. /19
The implication of Laschet's views (and persona) on those are far more complex and for another day. /20

More from World

1/10 With respect, multiple straw men here:
A) If you mean by "legally questionable" either that Senate is barred by constitution from trying an official impeached while in office, or that there are even very strong arguments against it, I have to differ...


2/10 Constitutional structure, precedent & any fair reading of original intent dictate that argument for jurisdiction is far stronger than argument against. On original intent, see

3/10 If you mean argument against jurisdiction is plausible, sure, it's plausible. It's just weak. In practical fact, Senate can try Trump now, find him guilty & disqualify him from future office if there are sufficient votes. And no court would presume to overturn that result

4/10 b) The argument from resources is awfully hard to take seriously. Fewer than a dozen House members act as Managers for a few weeks. They are staffed, as are Senators hearing case, by folks whose job it is to do stuff like this...

5/10 Yes, Senate floor time will be taken up. But it's past time for us to stop thinking of members of either house as feeble, fluttering, occupants of a nationally-funded convalescent home. There are nearly 500 of these people with 1000s of staff and a bunch of big buildings...
🧵 ⚡️ #Navalny, in handcuffs, expects his second verdict in one day NOW, about to be ready any minute now. He’s joking about cucumbers he pickles in his cell. I will translate his SECOND last address in one day but here is the previous trial coverage


Extracts from #Navalny last address #2 today: “Putin’s party is akin a swine devouring oil and gas dollars from a trough, & when poked & reminded that $ are for everyone, growls, “What about the WWII? What about veterans?!” The verdict is due any minute now. #FreeNavalny 👇🏼☝🏼

The judge is back and reads the verdict now.

“The politician criticized the participants in the [RT] video in support of the amendments to the Constitution, calling the presenters "corrupt lackeys", "traitors" and "people without conscience."

The judge says Navalny pleaded not guilty and called the persecution politicized.

You May Also Like

Rig Ved 1.36.7

To do a Namaskaar or bow before someone means that you are humble or without pride and ego. This means that we politely bow before you since you are better than me. Pranipaat(प्राणीपात) also means the same that we respect you without any vanity.

1/9


Surrendering False pride is Namaskaar. Even in devotion or bhakti we say the same thing. We want to convey to Ishwar that we have nothing to offer but we leave all our pride and offer you ourselves without any pride in our body. You destroy all our evil karma.

2/9

We bow before you so that you assimilate us and make us that capable. Destruction of our evils and surrender is Namaskaar. Therefore we pray same thing before and after any big rituals.

3/9

तं घे॑मि॒त्था न॑म॒स्विन॒ उप॑ स्व॒राज॑मासते ।
होत्रा॑भिर॒ग्निं मनु॑षः॒ समिं॑धते तिति॒र्वांसो॒ अति॒ स्रिधः॑॥

Translation :

नमस्विनः - To bow.

स्वराजम् - Self illuminating.

तम् - His.

घ ईम् - Yours.

इत्था - This way.

उप - Upaasana.

आसते - To do.

स्त्रिधः - For enemies.

4/9

अति तितिर्वांसः - To defeat fast.

मनुषः - Yajman.

होत्राभिः - In seven numbers.

अग्निम् - Agnidev.

समिन्धते - Illuminated on all sides.

Explanation : Yajmans bow(do Namaskaar) before self illuminating Agnidev by making the offerings of Havi.

5/9