Today is “Korean American Day”.

#OTD in 1903, the first large group of Korean immigrants arrived in US-conquered territory. [Thread]

102 Korean men, women, and children arrived in Honolulu aboard the SS Gaelic to work in Hawaii’s sugar plantations. By 1905, Koreans comprised 11% of Hawaii’s plantation workforce—around 7000 people.
This first wave of Korean immigrants arrived amid sharpening imperialist rivalry in the Pacific. Korea had slowly been losing its independence for decades, and by 1903 was just two years away from becoming a protectorate of Japan.
At the same time, the US was consolidating its position in the Pacific, annexing Hawaii, Guam, and the Philippines in 1898, and partitioning Samoa in 1899.

(Pictured: US troops in the Philippines)
US missionaries colluded with the Hawaiian Sugar Planters Association to secure a new, cheap labor force for Hawaii’s sugar fields. Many of the Koreans who arrived in Hawaii from 1903-1905 were Methodists.
Promised an opportunity to escape religious persecution and poverty, Koreans arrived to find themselves exploited by Hawaii’s sugar barons.
Hawaii’s sugar plantations profited off of imported Asian labor for decades, especially from Japan. Foreign workers were preferred over native workers because their interests did not align with the Kanaka Maoli (native Hawaiians), and they were easier to control.
Once Japanese plantation workers became numerous & organized enough to pose a threat to profits, Koreans were brought in to weaken worker solidarity.

(Pictured: Koreans in Hawaii greeting newly arrived Korean immigrants at the dock)
This strategy was mostly successful, although Koreans did participate in some strikes.
Because Koreans arrived in Hawaii after annexation, US labor laws applied and they were not subjected to long-term contracts that bound them to plantations like previous migrant laborers.
Many Koreans were therefore able to leave the plantations relatively quickly. Some left for Korea and California, while others moved to the cities.

(Pictured: Koreans in Riverside, CA in 1911)
Korean immigration to the US was greatly reduced in the early 20th century. In 1905, the government of Korea banned emigration to the US and Mexico in response to reports of the abuse of migrants.
As part of the 1907 Gentlemen's Agreement between the US and Japan, which partitioned the Pacific into colonial spheres of influence, all subjects of Japan's empire (including Koreans) were banned from immigration to the US.
Although most Korean immigration was ended, about 1000 Korean women were allowed to migrate as “picture brides”—women chosen for marriage by overseas Korean men through photo advertisements.
In 1924, the Oriental Exclusion Act banned all Asian immigration, including picture brides.
In 2003 (the 100th anniversary of the 1st wave of Koreans who arrived to Hawaii), Congress declared January 13th “Korean American Day” to commemorate the “immense contributions” of Koreans.
This reflects the typical immigrant narrative in the US, which celebrates immigrant “contributions” and romanticizes immigrant labor without acknowledging settler colonialism or imperialism.
There are many ways to tell the story of Korean Americans. By emphasizing imperialism in the Pacific, we can connect the history of Korea with the history of Indigenous and colonized people throughout Asia, Oceania, the Americas, and Africa.
Rather than a liberal identity politics that encourages assimilation, we can practice an anti-colonial identity politics that encourages solidarity and resistance.

More from World

A quick thread on #Myitsone dam & #MyanmarChinaRelations in light of the SAC announcement that they would be restarting some stalled Chinese projects in Burma. This announcement has led to speculation about Myitsone, which has been suspended since 2011. Let’s go! ➡️ China has


consistently misunderstood & underestimated popular opposition to Myitsone. First and foremost, to the Burmese people, this is about the “mother river” of Burma - the Irrawaddy- and it’s nearly sacred importance to them as a lifeline of their country. This is what drove the

organic anti-dam movement that started locally in Kachin but +/- 2007 was effectively picked up & nationalized by Burmese environmental CSOs. Instead of understanding this, the Chinese lashed out and blamed the United States when Thein Sein suspended the project. I assure you

the USG was as surprised as China when the project was suspended. But China never believed it was truly the desire of the Burmese people that stopped the project. Today, the dam doesn’t make sense economically for Beijing & will definitely alienate Burmese, yet they stubbornly

continue to push it. Why? Let’s unpack a bit further. In addition to Myitsone, there were other campaigns & protests targeting Chinese projects such as Letpadaung copper mine & Kyaukphyu pipeline, port & SEZ. While these campaigns had varying levels off effect, none was as

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq