As witch-hunt #3 gets underway by @BeatriceJanzon
@sverigesradio
@sr_ekot against me, Keith Begg, a citizen of Ireland and Sweden and no doubt some members of the FB Group I would like to post some questions to the above:
🆘Is it ethical, that the tactics and antics of a state

media station, paid for with taxpayers money, can infiltrate a Private FB group and try to discredit them? This is done in the most authoritarian of states.
🆘Is it ethical that the Honorable David Nabarro from @WHO had to issue a press release due to being deliberately
misquoting in Swedish media?
🆘Are these headlines reflective of what you would see in free media in a democracy, when the rest of the world was posting quite opposite headlines about Sweden?
🆘Does the deliberate distortion of information on Swedish TV constitute any
breaches of trust? Why was it done? After all when the government changed its C19 strategy on the Gov website, they deemed it a mistake?
🆘Not to mind the Italian embassy having to issue three statements over false claims by Tegnell
which were picked up by the media. Do I as a private citizen think that @RSF_en made a big mistake by recognizing Sweden as #4 in terms of Freedom of the Press? ABSOLUTELY. We want to know what they based their decisions on. Because it is clear to many

https://t.co/VrIJq2EiiH
living in #Sweden that the media for the most part with notable exceptions have been biased. And as for the 700 million SEK bailout, bribe call it what you will given to the #Swedish media when other areas such as care were dealing with huge shortages.
does that not raise suspicious questions?
🆘I would like to see what the exact conditions were given to media outlets before they could avail of the bailout money.
🆘I would like to see the indicators used by @RSF_en to award #Sweden #4 in terms of freedom of the press for 2020.
Everything in the authorities tool box is being used to silence and discredit those critical of the Swedish strategy. #ReturnSwedenToDemocracy
@DiPiep @JoannaTeglund @ZeroCovAlliance @ASlavitt @GoldbergRadio @DrWhistleblowe1 @Charlie_Hebdo_ @BBCWorld @BBCPolitics @DeutscheWelle
@France24 @nytimes @JohnHopkins @tomaspueyo @imperialcollege @AJEnglish @CNN @AC360 @SackurStephen @BBCHARDtalk @fotoole @DainiusPuras @anticorruption @DrTedros @DrMikeRyan @BBC_HaveYourSay @camanpour @cphpost @Aftenposten @derStandardat @nzherald @DomPost @tn_cz @bleskcz
@LaStampa @repubblica @elpaisinenglish @koreatimescokr @TheKoreaHerald @taipei_times @Taiwan_Today @hsfi @turunsanomat @swissinfo_en @orla_barry @sineadbaker1 @Guardian @Observer @thejournal_ie @eirikveum @LeoVaradkar @yaneerbaryam @chrispleasance @MailOnline @mika_salminen
@jonathanvswan @laoneill111 @Karl_Lauterbach @philipoconnor @PresidentIRL @MaryLouMcDonald @DrAnthonyF @nhc_no @FinGovernment @finlandinuk @LaVanguardia @clarincom @ElNacionalWeb @clarineconomico @ElUniversal @latercera
@TelemundoNews @Telemundo @lajornadaonline @elcomerciocom
@Milenio @proceso @ElMercurio_cl @Reforma
@sextaNoticias @laSextaTV @canarias7 @MIRAMETV
@Cahora @canariasnotiweb @CanariasNotic @elpaisinenglish @ElNuevoDia @ElNuevoDia @el_pais @primerahora @diariolaopinion @elnuevoherald @noticiaswrtu

More from World

1/10 With respect, multiple straw men here:
A) If you mean by "legally questionable" either that Senate is barred by constitution from trying an official impeached while in office, or that there are even very strong arguments against it, I have to differ...


2/10 Constitutional structure, precedent & any fair reading of original intent dictate that argument for jurisdiction is far stronger than argument against. On original intent, see

3/10 If you mean argument against jurisdiction is plausible, sure, it's plausible. It's just weak. In practical fact, Senate can try Trump now, find him guilty & disqualify him from future office if there are sufficient votes. And no court would presume to overturn that result

4/10 b) The argument from resources is awfully hard to take seriously. Fewer than a dozen House members act as Managers for a few weeks. They are staffed, as are Senators hearing case, by folks whose job it is to do stuff like this...

5/10 Yes, Senate floor time will be taken up. But it's past time for us to stop thinking of members of either house as feeble, fluttering, occupants of a nationally-funded convalescent home. There are nearly 500 of these people with 1000s of staff and a bunch of big buildings...

You May Also Like

IMPORTANCE, ADVANTAGES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF BHAGWAT PURAN

It was Ved Vyas who edited the eighteen thousand shlokas of Bhagwat. This book destroys all your sins. It has twelve parts which are like kalpvraksh.

In the first skandh, the importance of Vedvyas


and characters of Pandavas are described by the dialogues between Suutji and Shaunakji. Then there is the story of Parikshit.
Next there is a Brahm Narad dialogue describing the avtaar of Bhagwan. Then the characteristics of Puraan are mentioned.

It also discusses the evolution of universe.(
https://t.co/2aK1AZSC79 )

Next is the portrayal of Vidur and his dialogue with Maitreyji. Then there is a mention of Creation of universe by Brahma and the preachings of Sankhya by Kapil Muni.


In the next section we find the portrayal of Sati, Dhruv, Pruthu, and the story of ancient King, Bahirshi.
In the next section we find the character of King Priyavrat and his sons, different types of loks in this universe, and description of Narak. ( https://t.co/gmDTkLktKS )


In the sixth part we find the portrayal of Ajaamil ( https://t.co/LdVSSNspa2 ), Daksh and the birth of Marudgans( https://t.co/tecNidVckj )

In the seventh section we find the story of Prahlad and the description of Varnashram dharma. This section is based on karma vaasna.