https://t.co/Ufu03lhOpD
I'll bite, Mr. Gray. We can even play by your rather finicky rules.
Let's begin with some of the things you have said about Xinjiang, notably absent from your more recent media appearances, but still present in your blog about your 2014 biking trip.
Prove it...
— Jerry's China (@Jerry_grey2002) December 30, 2020
Without quoting Adrian Zenz who's never been there or exiles and criminals who seek asylum or cash for their stories or perhaps some satellite images of shopping centres and factories with fencelines.
You can't show any evidence that this is true https://t.co/wiozJIjusH
https://t.co/Ufu03lhOpD
You'll also see, if you read, and you obviously have, that I've never denied Xinjiang security is a pain in the butt - I've mentioned it several times, including on my CGTN and my Isobel Cockerel interview, as well as in my writing - there's the reason it's a pain in the butt
— Jerry's China (@Jerry_grey2002) January 1, 2021
China's cruel treatment of my family made me become an activist, and I won\u2019t stop until I see my mother.
— Akida Pulat (@akida_p) October 7, 2020
People on Twitter, I need your help in sharing my story to rescue my mother and other Uyghurs. Please google Uyghur, listen to Uyghur\u2019s testimonies, and share our story. pic.twitter.com/cdlDQ78C39
The biggest giveaway of accounts like BCT is that they don\u2019t talk about East Turkestan, the ETIP, CIA funded Wahhabi militias.... they just focus on \u201chere is bad thing China doing something human writes, haha journalism points go brrrrrrrr\u201d ok good night
— Bad Leninism Takes \u262d \U0001f41f\u26cf\U0001f96d\U0001f354\U0001f336\U0001f42c (@BadLeninism) January 1, 2021
More from World
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
A thread 👇
https://t.co/xj4js6shhy
Entrepreneur\u2019s mind.
— James Clear (@JamesClear) August 22, 2020
Athlete\u2019s body.
Artist\u2019s soul.
https://t.co/b81zoW6u1d
When you choose who to follow on Twitter, you are choosing your future thoughts.
— James Clear (@JamesClear) October 3, 2020
https://t.co/1147it02zs
Working on a problem reduces the fear of it.
— James Clear (@JamesClear) August 30, 2020
It\u2019s hard to fear a problem when you are making progress on it\u2014even if progress is imperfect and slow.
Action relieves anxiety.
https://t.co/A7XCU5fC2m
We often avoid taking action because we think "I need to learn more," but the best way to learn is often by taking action.
— James Clear (@JamesClear) September 23, 2020