Who is behind Moldova’s Twitter Revolution? (Prelude to all-out civil war 2009)
“A lot of what we [National Endowment for Democracy] do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.” -Allen 🕎 Weinstein #Transnistria
https://t.co/Y8uKJPgVF2

More from Bubba Rogowski (Telegram = t.me/RogowskiBubba)

OMG, the #antisemites think that it's a zionist nuclear espionage conspiracy!😂
#JonathanPollard #Israeli #nuclear #Espionage
https://t.co/1Jw8U4ooCG

The UC Global spying campaign against #Assange, #CIA, a Jewish guy named Zohar Lahav and Sheldon (the ultra zionist) Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands as CIA front & #Trump involved in a special #Spanish investigation? 🤓

https://t.co/GlSAgVac95


History of Israeli Tech Domination
Billions of dollars are being sucked out of the #US economy through government contracts to #Israeli technology and cybersecurity companies. Essentially, Israel runs the national security state.
https://t.co/yDxyv5AlaP


Kill Switch - #Israel, #Microsoft, #Iran, #Russia, #China
The ramifications of High Tech transfer and spying are catastrophic, the thing is "no one seems to connect the dots"😉

https://t.co/HQMxoqWL96


The Israeli Programs That Help The NSA Organize Its Intelligence
The British - Chinese Opium wars - Foreign mud Part 1
(Note: the British "elite" made their fortunes with opium and still do 😉)
https://t.co/eeUUJU1hnG


Aaron Hardoon (1851-1931): Business, Opium, Politics and Philanthropy in Republican Shanghai, 1911-1931
Hardoon and Trade Diaspora of Baghdadi Jews
https://t.co/pzOsXyoXKZ

You are looking at a handful of Scottish Opium Traders.

Keswick Family :

An old firm:
https://t.co/XURQUI11nH. Check Governance. 1600's. HBC is still going.

Common founders to HSBC

The Governors is where it's at.

House of #Windsor, #uk "Elite" 🤔
"In the early 1800s, the Brits controlled 90 percent of the #Chinese opium trade".
#British East Indian Company in 1715 till today, mass scale drug addiction was a policy against targeted

The British - Chinese Opium wars - Harrying the Chinese coast Part 2
(Note: the British "elite" made their fortunes with opium and still do 😉)
https://t.co/sZzx2dz4mG

More from World

You May Also Like

1/12

RT-PCR corona (test) scam

Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


2/12

It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


3/12

The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu


4/12

Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID


5/12

Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?