An explanation of what is going on with the Salmond enquiry.

Alex Salmond was the leader of the SNP and was first minister of Scotland, but he stepped down from this position after the SNP failed to secure the Scottish Referendum.

Nicola Sturgeon took his place.

Nicola was basically Salmonds underling and he was her mentor. They were very close.

Everything after this point is all speculation/allegations, so take everything with a pinch of salt until the facts come out.

If the SNP ever allow them to come out.
A rift had been growing for many years between Salmond and Sturgeon as he felt she was not progressing enough towards an independent Scotland, probably because the party focuses mainly on woke bullshit and hate crime laws for memes.

Salmond hinted a return to the party.
Around about this time, with very convenient timing, Salmond got MeToo'd by several women within the SNP, this resulted in a massive police investigation, seriously huge, with the cops interviewing around 400 people.

Salmond was charged with several counts of sexual assault.
The case goes to trial, which results in Salmond being aquitted of all charges.

This is usually where such things would end, but it turns out this exposed everyone to a rabbit hole of alleged corruption within the SNP at it's highest levels.
Important to include that not only was he aquitted, but an enquiry also found the governments action against him unlawful, and he was awarded £500,000 in legal costs.
A parliamentary enquiry was launched to investigate the "mishandling" of this case by the Scottish government.

Some people consider this to be due to him being aquitted, some people believe it was part of a conspiracy to bring Salmond down as he threatened Sturgeons power.
Craig Murray, an ex-ambassador and diplomat, released the identities of Salmonds accusers, which resulted in him being charged with contempt of court.

In this article for The Majority, his defence statements say some pretty damning things about the SNP and Sturgeon.
He alleges that in his meetings with Salmond, Nicola Sturgeon and other high ranking SNP members, conspired to bring Salmond down.

Again, all of this is currently just allegations.
He also alleges that the SNP put major pressure on the police themselves to go ahead with the investigation, that it was something they really pushed for.

The whole "what evidence do you need" angle is pretty sus.
As the statement goes on, it seems the alleged victims were being treated like tools, with one even saying they felt more "pressured than supported" to go ahead with the allegations.

Indicates the party were more concerned with destroying Salmond, than getting justice.
You can read the entire thing here :

https://t.co/tkUGJhANbZ
He then closes with the reasons he made the names of the accusers public.
All of this still ongoing within the Scottish parliament, but it also includes a lot of fuckery, people giving conflicting statements, some people contradicting themselves, evidence being withheld, as well as accusations of Sturgeon breaking ministerial code by lying.
As enquiries are still ongoing, just a few days ago, Nicola Sturgeons own husband was giving evidence via video call, and during the call it is claimed he was "constantly looking to the left" leading to allegations that he was being coached off-camera about what to say.
There are many more things that I did not include for the sake of brevity, but this seriously is a huge rabbit hole and again it is still important to note that all of this far is just allegations. We don't have the full facts yet, and we might never get them.
But, if all of this turns out to be true, then it's over for the SNP, not only will the parties reputation be in the gutter, but many of its most prominent figures will have to resign and possibly face criminal charges themselves
If the upper echelons of this government are abusing their power in order to increase that power, then the Scottish people have a right to know, so I am happy with a full and unbiased enquiry, free from SNP influence, taking place.

More from World

Good question: what proofs has BDA provided of his authenticity?

Let's go through some of them.


- BDA predicted the Saudis would assassinate Suleimani. They did.
- He said the dog that got Badghadi's arm deserved a Medal Of Honor. The next day the President posted a joke image showing him giving the dog a MoH.

- He said one of his ops in Syria would severely disrupt a CIA drug trafficking operation. This was proved true within a few days:
https://t.co/Hranupwcxj
- He sent gold to Brazil to help pay for an anti-trafficking operation there. That op became public soon afterwards.

- On May 31 this year, he predicted the President would be giving a speech the next day. June 1, the President gives a surprise address at the Rose Garden.
- He predicted the US would be making diplomatic moves on Greenland. True.

- He said the US would be pulling all troops out of Afghanistan. This was confirmed within the month.
- He claimed earthquakes would be hitting Iran's nuclear facilities in December. Yep.
- There were FOUR facilities hit, not the three made public. Also true.
A few thoughts on this sad development 👇👇

20 academics criticizing an paper is fine; good science, really

10000+ hate mail for studying schools in Sweden is insane

Anonymous docs/ prof (hiding in faceless accts) on twitter smearing researchers is insane
[thread] https://t.co/QYldLD3WO0


In April 2020, @jflier and I saw this coming

We saw increasingly heated and personal attacks against scientists merely for having a range of views on COVID19 (PS there is no playbook/ right ans)

Tying science to naked politics was also bad idea, we

Yet, repeatedly that is what happened. Twitter 'experts' displayed an absolute intolerance to other views

Folks who disagreed weren't just wrong, they were malicious actors spreading "disinformation"

Really? Someone worked for 25 years as faculty to suddenly spread lies?

Disinformation has been so misused that it has lost meaning.

I recently saw an ID doc & lab researcher in the UK be accused of spreading "disinformation"

hahah, get outta here, you are trying to say "i disagree" but your keyboard is broken

Personal attacks have become so bad that I have seen a lab researcher accuse a doctor of wanting to engage in inappropriate relationships with patients due to diverging views on vaccine messaging

Seriously? It was a low point even for twitter

You May Also Like

I'm going to do two history threads on Ethiopia, one on its ancient history, one on its modern story (1800 to today). 🇪🇹

I'll begin with the ancient history ... and it goes way back. Because modern humans - and before that, the ancestors of humans - almost certainly originated in Ethiopia. 🇪🇹 (sub-thread):


The first likely historical reference to Ethiopia is ancient Egyptian records of trade expeditions to the "Land of Punt" in search of gold, ebony, ivory, incense, and wild animals, starting in c 2500 BC 🇪🇹


Ethiopians themselves believe that the Queen of Sheba, who visited Israel's King Solomon in the Bible (c 950 BC), came from Ethiopia (not Yemen, as others believe). Here she is meeting Solomon in a stain-glassed window in Addis Ababa's Holy Trinity Church. 🇪🇹


References to the Queen of Sheba are everywhere in Ethiopia. The national airline's frequent flier miles are even called "ShebaMiles". 🇪🇹