Let's take a look at some facts and try to understand our civilization.
River Saraswati was completely dried up by 1500 BCE - 2000 BCE.
River Saraswati, Rigveda, Mahabharata and Our Civilization.
Saraswati has been a point of discussion when we look at the antiquity of civilization.
It has been concluded that gradually drying Saraswati led to outward migrations at regular interval in past thousands of years,
Let's take a look at some facts and try to understand our civilization.
River Saraswati was completely dried up by 1500 BCE - 2000 BCE.
There has been many Researchers working on hydrogeological study of the Saraswati River bed and when we combine the research of all these studies, we find that:
It was drying up and was on support of few other local rivers showing herself at few places during 3000 BCE - 4000 BCE
It was flowing at some places beautifully while became invisible at few places,
It was flowing as perennial river supported by heavy monsoon during 10,000 to 13,000 BCE
It was most grand River of the Indian subcontinent with span of few kilometres
River Saraswati has changed its course of flow at many points of time as it's flow gradually lessened before completely drying up.
Now look at few description from our scriptures:
In later Mandal of Rigveda, River Saraswati is mentioned but it looses the grand stature of RV 10:75. That means composer is now looking at River Saraswati as one of the main River of
Mahabharata Anushashan Parva (139-140, 146) Saraswati is described as one of the main rivers flowing beautifully.
Pic credit - pinterest and @NileshOak
To be continue ....
More from धर्म इतिहास
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
