Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop

Drop 1639:

SEC TEST
SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission

Sec Test:
https://t.co/jKOavMuEOH
EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval

"Purpose" ?

increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings

KEY WORD -> accessibility
"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"

Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?

White Hats, POTUS etc. ?
"The EDGAR database can be searched using the company ticker symbol ... Most of the filings made through EDGAR are available for download or can be viewed for free. "
Section 230 in the news recently

GOOG
FB
TWTR
Message / Translation =

We know the shady activity you have been up to and how you've financed it.

DROP 596:

WE HAVE IT ALL

Coming soon to a theater near you.

FOLKS, TIME TO GET THAT POPCORN READY, BECAUSE ITS ABOUT TO HABBEN

More from Trump

This is mostly right but strikes me as it needing said that I don't think the left or the intelligentsia have the slightest idea how low institutional trust in anything coming from a left mouthpiece is now. Except in-network, the best heuristic is "the opposite of what they said"


If you look at the situation from a predictive models perspective instead of the more rigorous and appropriate (under normal circumstances) "prove your case or gtfo" perspective, trusting the opposite of whatever the left side says has an AMAZING track record, as we know it.

Literally, the best heuristic most people have right now, in terms of how often it gets things right versus *completely* wrong, is "whatever CNN, the NYT, public health officials, and the Democrats said... yeah, the opposite." That is, they're wrong WAY outside of statistics.

They're also not just wrong. They're *completely* wrong, backwards, often transparently covering something up that they don't want known or refuse to believe. This isn't just a legitimation crisis because there's a heuristic: whatever the official left narrative is, is wrong.

There are a few reasons why such a heuristic would be more predictive than not. One of those is conspiracy, and another is mass hysteria with ideological capture. We know at least one of those is happening and have rather strong evidence both are. That makes conspiracy reasonable

You May Also Like

Still wondering about this 🤔


save as q
Following @BAUDEGS I have experienced hateful and propagandist tweets time after time. I have been shocked that an academic community would be so reckless with their publications. So I did some research.
The question is:
Is this an official account for Bahcesehir Uni (Bau)?


Bahcesehir Uni, BAU has an official website
https://t.co/ztzX6uj34V which links to their social media, leading to their Twitter account @Bahcesehir

BAU’s official Twitter account


BAU has many departments, which all have separate accounts. Nowhere among them did I find @BAUDEGS
@BAUOrganization @ApplyBAU @adayBAU @BAUAlumniCenter @bahcesehirfbe @baufens @CyprusBau @bauiisbf @bauglobal @bahcesehirebe @BAUintBatumi @BAUiletisim @BAUSaglik @bauebf @TIPBAU

Nowhere among them was @BAUDEGS to find