1.
12/26/2020 - Trump Deleted Tweet comms
3 Deleted tweets on the 26th with several changes.
wan to -> want to
get our -> get out -> get our
+ measly
"I simply wan to get our" -> "I simply want to get out"
https://t.co/dH8ArTtYMs
Let's begin the decode.
I simply want to get our great people $2000, rather than the measly $600 that is now in the bill. Also, stop the billions of dollars in \u201cpork\u201d.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 26, 2020
More from CodesUcq
1.
Russia/USSR & Star Wars Decode
So how did the USSR fall? (First topic of many)
Let's start with Reagan's "Star Wars"
https://t.co/LsC84g2ei3
SDI was created to "protect the United States from attack by ballistic strategic nuclear weapons"
Russia/USSR & Star Wars Decode
So how did the USSR fall? (First topic of many)
Let's start with Reagan's "Star Wars"
https://t.co/LsC84g2ei3
SDI was created to "protect the United States from attack by ballistic strategic nuclear weapons"
03/23/1983 National Security: President Reagans Address on Defense and National Security. SDI/Star Wars https://t.co/AqgdmjEadF
— CodesUcq (@CodesUcq) December 23, 2020
More from Trump
TS = 4:40 pm
Drop 1640: https://t.co/2xyG4PqvH9
Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop
Drop 1639:
SEC TEST
SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission
Sec
EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval
"Purpose" ?
increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings
KEY WORD -> accessibility
"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"
Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?
White Hats, POTUS etc. ?
Drop 1640: https://t.co/2xyG4PqvH9
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 28, 2020
Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop
Drop 1639:
SEC TEST
SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission
Sec
EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval
"Purpose" ?
increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings
KEY WORD -> accessibility
"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"
Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?
White Hats, POTUS etc. ?
You May Also Like
The first area to focus on is diversity. This has become a dogma in the tech world, and despite the fact that tech is one of the most meritocratic industries in the world, there are constant efforts to promote diversity at the expense of fairness, merit and competency. Examples:
USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the
ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.
Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this
Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35
USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the
ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.
Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this
Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".