Hey @AriFleischer. Manafort was prosecuted because he worked for Trump. @AWeissmann_ went after Trump people until he found crimes or arm-twisted them into pleading on process crimes such as maybe lying about legal things. Every Mueller victim deserves a pardon!

.@AriFleischer Your wing of the GOP likes to whine about MEDIAAA but you guys can’t see beyond what media sells so let me educate you about Manafort: His doors were punched open in July 2017 before @RodRosenstein gave Mueller power to go after non-Russia things. AFTER the raid,
Rosenstein wrote a Scope Memo. In it, he gave Mueller & Thugs the authority to go after 4 people about Russia and each of them also on possible crimes unrelated to Russia and unrelated to the other people such as Manafort’s Ukraine work. Please tell me @AriFleischer what is the
justice of unleashing a special counsel on people rather than on a crime? Wanting to investigate collusion anew (after 12 months investigating turning up nothing) is one level of abuse. But what’s this cruelty of listing names and a free pass to look at other items? Pardon away!
.@AriFleischer Prosecutor abuse is not just when a non-guilty person gets pinched. Abuse can be even if the victim of the abuse has committed a violation such as Manafort. @RodRosenstein had no business appointing Mueller 12 months into the Feds not finding anything. They knew
from the start of Mueller that there is NOTHING there. @petestrzok texted as much to @NatSecLisa. @JohnBrennan and Clapper both told Congress that when they left on 1/20/20 they has found nothing. The Obama leftovers who ran from TV show to TV show barking about COLLUSION were
asked by Congress in closed briefings during 2017 if they saw evidence of collusion and they ALL said no but then ran back to TV yelling about Collusion. The next abuse was that @AWeissmann_ went after people on unrelated stuff rather than on just collusion. cc @AriFleischer
The third abuse was that @RodRosenstein’s scope memo was written only in August; ten weeks of Mueller on the job and aftsd @AWeissmann_ had started going after Trump people for other stuff which was outside his authority. Rather than stop this abuse, RR’s memo enabled it more.
.@AriFleischer In all, the Manafort prosecution comes from a poisoned well and thus should be corrected. Besides, tax violations should not land a first-time convicted person into prison for many years or for any amount of years.

More from Trump

You’d think that if Pence could overturn the election like Trump claimed then Biden surely would’ve taken up that chance


Also this is such a small thing but one thing I noticed in that Trump campaign ad the defense just ran, there were no citations, unlike every clip that the impeachment managers showed

Michael Van Der Veen is giving us the full Fox News Primetime Defense.

PROCESS ARGUMENT.

DRINK.

Lol my guy this is the chance to rebut the evidence that they’ve presented against Trump.

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?