Some anons have notices "the" and "dam" and "the" vs. "to"...

Their posts included here as a thread...

https://t.co/OT6Z7ZAERH
https://t.co/d3Ct3UDKQd
https://t.co/yzMXiCBIXA
https://t.co/wpxloyHycj

More from David Burney

The timing is nearly upon us... https://t.co/vmc8WvyxjS


"only way"


https://t.co/ach8pRWblF


The only way is the military: "I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..."


Seems almost like Trump planned for this very
For those doubters, learn [digital] camouflage from a master...

https://t.co/q0fx0ahdbi


https://t.co/AgWercIIpJ


https://t.co/9rXo7p2NL0


https://t.co/cpCamkS7UY
3 tweets in one graphic.
Reconcile.


When is a B2 no longer


Cautious steps when walking on


3966 (we are ready)


3784 (Slow drip > Flood)
This has been known since the beginning of this plannedemic, just unreported by media.


For those wondering, it is right on the NIH

More sauce from

And from 4/30 MSM before they reworked the narrative.
Coronavirus Drug Exclusive: Meet The Doctor Behind The Hydroxychloroquine Treatment, And What’s Next For Its Use – CBS New

Even more sauce...
Turkey claims success treating COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine, the drug touted by Trump - CBS

More from Trump

TS = 4:40 pm
Drop 1640: https://t.co/2xyG4PqvH9


Pic of Last bread = Previous Drop

Drop 1639:

SEC TEST


SEC = Securities and Exchange Commission

Sec

EDGAR:
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval

"Purpose" ?

increase the efficiency and accessibility of corporate filings

KEY WORD -> accessibility

"EDGAR has greatly decreased the time it takes for corporate documents to become publicly available"

Available to who ?
Public + who more specifically?

White Hats, POTUS etc. ?
This is mostly right but strikes me as it needing said that I don't think the left or the intelligentsia have the slightest idea how low institutional trust in anything coming from a left mouthpiece is now. Except in-network, the best heuristic is "the opposite of what they said"


If you look at the situation from a predictive models perspective instead of the more rigorous and appropriate (under normal circumstances) "prove your case or gtfo" perspective, trusting the opposite of whatever the left side says has an AMAZING track record, as we know it.

Literally, the best heuristic most people have right now, in terms of how often it gets things right versus *completely* wrong, is "whatever CNN, the NYT, public health officials, and the Democrats said... yeah, the opposite." That is, they're wrong WAY outside of statistics.

They're also not just wrong. They're *completely* wrong, backwards, often transparently covering something up that they don't want known or refuse to believe. This isn't just a legitimation crisis because there's a heuristic: whatever the official left narrative is, is wrong.

There are a few reasons why such a heuristic would be more predictive than not. One of those is conspiracy, and another is mass hysteria with ideological capture. We know at least one of those is happening and have rather strong evidence both are. That makes conspiracy reasonable

You May Also Like