When he sided with Putin in Helsinki Republicans were in Moscow in secret meetings they voted not to release the transcript
When Trump knowingly accepted Russian help and obstructed the doj investigation and lied to the American people about who attacked our elections or extorting Ukraine the republicans didn't provide a valid counter argument
they asked "who unmasked?" or leaked or whistleblew
When he sided with Putin in Helsinki Republicans were in Moscow in secret meetings they voted not to release the transcript
When a federal judge said Bill Barr had misrepresented that report they ignored it
And Ratcliffe said he wouldn't breathe the Intel committee on the interference
GOP ignored it.
They attacked American heroes and our own ambassadors
The same lawyers and PR people who got in trouble for showing anti magnitsky films at the Newseum the night
Bannon tried to bring her aboard Trump's cabinet early on also
The reality is that Rosenstein and Mueller put the ball down and walked away
Yesterday Donald Trump left office and I didn't see a single sealed indictment for any of his extortion or bribery or treason
Pompeo for his role the Ukraine bribery and Ambassador stalking
William Barr for how he appointed an oversight committee
Where are charges?
They didn't just conceal his crimes they helped him murder us with this information about a deadly virus
Some of them asked other state election officials to throw a democratic vote and some of them put out fake drop boxes so people couldn't mail their ballots
None of them denounced his
By people like Giuliani who was actually stalking an American ambassador and falsifying State Department docs... who is still free
More from Trump
@WestJournalism DemoKKKrats just LOVED the BLM/Antifa rioters when they descended upon DC! Nancy Pelosi even Tweeted:
https://t.co/MbXFf5Xc4u
I would like to see Democrats produce even one shred of evidence or just one example of President Trump calling for insurrection. Just one. That's all.
https://t.co/MbXFf5Xc4u
I would like to see Democrats produce even one shred of evidence or just one example of President Trump calling for insurrection. Just one. That's all.
We welcome the presence of these activists, and we strongly urge the Capitol Police to allow them to continue to organize and participate in our democracy.
— Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) November 13, 2018
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
