https://t.co/7DjG8ElT7d
https://t.co/n4bAh3w1MC
https://t.co/jy7Ud7aAM1
https://t.co/227pi3f1cw
https://t.co/tacC1OonHw
https://t.co/gYzycW2v7h
https://t.co/65WJzl2Ch3
https://t.co/BDvf2yOhoz
https://t.co/Jf99Kcc2pi
https://t.co/bgTHkpg8VO
https://t.co/zPBt5WqwAj
https://t.co/cUPFMVh1e9
https://t.co/UJg8b7MVsb
https://t.co/qxpev9B1cu
https://t.co/TdKM1yBR8u
https://t.co/Hcjql1GqZa
https://t.co/SMjtkJRHzq
https://t.co/QA7xreudoB
https://t.co/JfZMvXQYYz
https://t.co/5jr8B3eLRO
https://t.co/Pp6VPRv1M5
https://t.co/8pCtp9OkTf
https://t.co/csgISNS4YE
https://t.co/2ij7k8wv4c
https://t.co/P4BQymG3uW
https://t.co/aF7faoSsKJ
https://t.co/AmHI28NaK6
https://t.co/wLiESCw7Ok
https://t.co/HlwV9hloWP
https://t.co/rQKQCctoqc
https://t.co/vdtlXuznvl
https://t.co/npQ7hhoWbr
https://t.co/UZJSPmHf2R
https://t.co/rbbuKfx2fX
https://t.co/XkFch0C6Jq
https://t.co/eo8JKY5Hvk
https://t.co/tSbhYtrnUc
https://t.co/E3u6niWUFq
https://t.co/0ZbnqDb1Fd
https://t.co/r1IG059Vkj
https://t.co/mmdu8jndEj
https://t.co/9ShpNrhw3z
https://t.co/JTiesbPSvP
https://t.co/FwftIhoEPf
https://t.co/tq8WqnpE7w
https://t.co/u1D0FOA4ma
https://t.co/MnZlXLbuTa
https://t.co/8a0ROvRSEf
https://t.co/ITyyZAUraN
https://t.co/EQoWZXcIcR
https://t.co/VlXcN2SGR4
https://t.co/OR3RLCNvHv
https://t.co/1ArjTFIlip
https://t.co/Uga7aBt2UN
https://t.co/eKkP4u6c9B
https://t.co/s5PVKCtZS9
https://t.co/E5eEYQUeUp
https://t.co/QNvAb2o0PD
https://t.co/LPPpfkVdnA
https://t.co/pwrrIyAz2A
https://t.co/dWITINsG2Q
https://t.co/AmQlcrFFCI

More from Tradingthread

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x