By far, one of the most interesting Ethereum addresses I've seen is @0x_b1.

It's quite an interesting social experiment as well - a $300m whale starting a Twitter account for fun. Check their bio.

Let's break down the address and see what they are doing with their capital. 👇

0xb1 was created in mid-August, amid the food farming craze.

The address is active every day of the week and consistently makes transactions between 12:00 UTC and 6:00 UTC (sleeps between 7-11).

Likely U.S. based individual or team based on this history.

h/t @nansen_ai
0xb1 is a yield farming beast, to say the least.

It's industrial farming at its best - hundreds of transactions, swapping in and out of the latest yield farms on Ethereum.

Fun fact: the address has spent $111,000 in ether on transaction fees since its inception. Ow.
According to @DeBankDeFi, the address has a current net worth of $280 million, with $381 million in assets or staked assets and $101 million in debt.

Not too sure if this is 100% accurate, as there may be some new farms that it may not capture or represent properly.
99% of this capital is active in yield farms.

Out of the ~$280 million, only ~$250k is naked.

The address has $150 million worth of ETH and WBTC collateral deposited in Compound, which is being used to borrow $80 million worth of stablecoins.

C-ratio scares me a bit.
An additional $38 million is supplied to Aave, most of which is in Chainlink.

Borrowing Ethereum, MANA (for DG farming), SNX, and a few other tokens.

Health factor of 1.34...

December's LINK wick ($12 -> $8) could put this at risk.
The address also has $4m deposited in Aave v2 (health factor of 1.35) and $1.6m in Cream (500% c-ratio).

One interesting bit about 0xb1's Cream balance is the use of ESD as collateral.

Cool to see that new collateral type being used.
Now, where are all these borrowed assets being put to work?

A large portion is in BadgerDAO ($47 million) and Harvest ($30 million).

This address appears to be long BADGER, with $400,000 in BADGER staked, and $1m in BADGER Uniswap LP pools.
0xb1 has $26m in ETH deposited in @AlphaFinanceLab's no-IL ibETH pool. Making a cool $2.6m at current interest levels.

Another $27.5m in Uniswap, mostly in USDC-ETH.

Also $10 million in SushiSwap's Onsen program.
The Alpha Chef is also pretty big on Empty Set Dollar and Dynamic Set Dollar.

$2.7 million in ESD-USDC LP and $550k in the DAO.

$500k in DSD-USDC LP.

No coupons as far as I can tell.
0xb1 has had a few mishaps.

The address holds 3,908,343 GRAIN—the claim token for the @harvest_finance attack. This can be sold for $260,000 assuming no Uniswap slippage.

This means the address lost $3.9 million in the Harvest attack, just over 10% of the total stolen amount.
Another mishap was the Compound DAI liquidation event in November.

DAI/USDC spiked to 1.3 late November, causing the oracle to print an extremely high price, liquidating Compound DAI borrowers.

I think the address lost $1.4 million in the liquidation of its position.
To be fair, this doesn't seem to be a massive concern for 0xb1.

The address earns somewhere in the range of ~$200,000-400,000 each day in yield.
What's most interesting IMO is 0xb1 is becoming an activist investor—or at least an activist farmer.

I'm keeping an eye on @0x_b1. Such a fascinating address - cool that they have a Twitter account as well.

https://t.co/xCohZCQiSb

More from Trading

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x