How I Trade

Easy. I trade with the trend. Buy low sell high for up trends. Sell high, buy low during down trends. I don’t care about fundamentals. Often I don’t even know what sector the stock is in. Half my trades, don’t even know the name of the company.

I look at the setup. I look for skew. If a few other variables line up. I stalk it for an entry.

Then I use options to maximize my capital. I mitigate the risk with diversification.
How to spot the trend?

Let’s take a look at this chart. Now. Let’s trade it.

I have no idea how. There are no landmarks. It could be going up, or down, maybe sideways. If I have no clue where it’s going. How do I make a plan? Where do I enter? Where is the exit?
Elliott Waves Principle

Now this one. A simple fact. If you see a 1-2 setup. 3 is next. 3 runs fast and hard. Usually between 100% to 161.8% of 1. However if price break down below 2. This trade is invalid. We have to consider an alternative.

Can you manage a trade like this?
How long does it take to learn Elliott Waves?

Months probably years to be an expert in it.

Not that is not going to do you any good eh? Years to master something before making any money.
Well. Here is the good news. You don’t have to analyse it yourself. I found a service that will do it for you. The best in the business. I have nothing to do with it. I am just a subscriber myself. Also. I am far from being an expert.
You’ll need to understand some basic principles. You don’t have to know everything. Just the concept of it. I will provide you with my trades. When you have developed the confidence. You can subscribe to the service yourself for $99. You won’t need me anymore.
Here is a PDF. This is a basic version of the book by Robert Prechter. The full version, you'll need to buy on Amazon.

https://t.co/hXiDAcRCeg
If you go into the service now. But you don’t understand what you’re seeing. It going to be overwhelming. This is because there isn’t a shared language.
The thing about trading. There are about a million ways to do it. I am sharing 1 that I use. It’s simple and repeatable. It can churn a small account fast. We’ll talk about risks. I’ll share my view. Then you can develop your own profile over time.
Why churn a small account?

If you can set aside a couple of thousand. Not your entire savings. The goal will be playing with house money ASAP. If all you have is a few thousand. Keeping it in the bank is not going to make you any richer. Neither will consuming it.
So we take money earned thru work and savings, make more money. Then use a portion of the profits to consume.
Why?

This way. The money you work for will always be there. It’s your capital. You don’t spend your hard earned money. The primary reason why rich people become richer and the poor become poorer.
I’ve never done this before. Making it up as I go along. Trying to explain what is inside my head. So I apologise if it’s not polished like a course for sale.

More from Trading

You May Also Like

MASTER THREAD on Short Strangles.

Curated the best tweets from the best traders who are exceptional at managing strangles.

• Positional Strangles
• Intraday Strangles
• Position Sizing
• How to do Adjustments
• Plenty of Examples
• When to avoid
• Exit Criteria

How to sell Strangles in weekly expiry as explained by boss himself. @Mitesh_Engr

• When to sell
• How to do Adjustments
• Exit


Beautiful explanation on positional option selling by @Mitesh_Engr
Sir on how to sell low premium strangles yourself without paying anyone. This is a free mini course in


1st Live example of managing a strangle by Mitesh Sir. @Mitesh_Engr

• Sold Strangles 20% cap used
• Added 20% cap more when in profit
• Booked profitable leg and rolled up
• Kept rolling up profitable leg
• Booked loss in calls
• Sold only


2nd example by @Mitesh_Engr Sir on converting a directional trade into strangles. Option Sellers can use this for consistent profit.

• Identified a reversal and sold puts

• Puts decayed a lot

• When achieved 2% profit through puts then sold
First update to https://t.co/lDdqjtKTZL since the challenge ended – Medium links!! Go add your Medium profile now 👀📝 (thanks @diannamallen for the suggestion 😁)


Just added Telegram links to
https://t.co/lDdqjtKTZL too! Now you can provide a nice easy way for people to message you :)


Less than 1 hour since I started adding stuff to https://t.co/lDdqjtKTZL again, and profile pages are now responsive!!! 🥳 Check it out -> https://t.co/fVkEL4fu0L


Accounts page is now also responsive!! 📱✨


💪 I managed to make the whole site responsive in about an hour. On my roadmap I had it down as 4-5 hours!!! 🤘🤠🤘
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?