Then I use options to maximize my capital. I mitigate the risk with diversification.
How I Trade
Easy. I trade with the trend. Buy low sell high for up trends. Sell high, buy low during down trends. I don’t care about fundamentals. Often I don’t even know what sector the stock is in. Half my trades, don’t even know the name of the company.
Then I use options to maximize my capital. I mitigate the risk with diversification.
Let’s take a look at this chart. Now. Let’s trade it.
I have no idea how. There are no landmarks. It could be going up, or down, maybe sideways. If I have no clue where it’s going. How do I make a plan? Where do I enter? Where is the exit?
Now this one. A simple fact. If you see a 1-2 setup. 3 is next. 3 runs fast and hard. Usually between 100% to 161.8% of 1. However if price break down below 2. This trade is invalid. We have to consider an alternative.
Can you manage a trade like this?
Months probably years to be an expert in it.
Not that is not going to do you any good eh? Years to master something before making any money.
https://t.co/hXiDAcRCeg
If you can set aside a couple of thousand. Not your entire savings. The goal will be playing with house money ASAP. If all you have is a few thousand. Keeping it in the bank is not going to make you any richer. Neither will consuming it.
More from Trading
DJ @ITRADE191 multiple chart analysis for INTRADAY TRADING.
1. Core setup
2. Pivot points trades
3. PDH/PDL trades
4. Open interest addictions combined with rejections on charts.
5. Website to confirm bias
Very quick read.
Share if you liked for the benefit of everyone.
•Main setup of @ITRADE191
He used this setup daily for all trades.
1. EMA crossover 10/20
2. Supertrend 10/3
3. Vwap
4. RSI >
•Volume always greater than
•Candle Rejecting from
•Pivot settings
1. Core setup
2. Pivot points trades
3. PDH/PDL trades
4. Open interest addictions combined with rejections on charts.
5. Website to confirm bias
Very quick read.
Share if you liked for the benefit of everyone.
•Main setup of @ITRADE191
He used this setup daily for all trades.
1. EMA crossover 10/20
2. Supertrend 10/3
3. Vwap
4. RSI >
@MiteshFan @Mitesh_Engr @Abhishekkar_ MY TRADING SETUP .... I've been using it for a long time .. result good try it \U0001f607 pic.twitter.com/XThUD0ftbl
— itrade(DJ) (@ITRADE191) June 13, 2020
•Volume always greater than
Volume Should always be above 20 pic.twitter.com/CPgxLgpPKF
— itrade(DJ) (@ITRADE191) June 13, 2020
•Candle Rejecting from
— itrade(DJ) (@ITRADE191) August 25, 2020
•Pivot settings
— itrade(DJ) (@ITRADE191) October 20, 2020
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
