Eg - Deepak Nitrite
3 Ways to ride a stock 🐎
(a thread) 🧵
>Do retweet if it adds value as this took a long time for me to make
1) 10/20 Day EMA -
Enter the stock as it comes up back to the 10/20 day EMA and ride it till it drops below or SL hits as explained below
Eg -Nitin Spinners as below
Eg - Deepak Nitrite
Do retweet if make sense so as I can make more of such thread
https://t.co/lJ00OKEVd2
Download equialpha app for free momentum basics course
https://t.co/9N7vFDorC8
Thanks for reading.. Do like
More from EquiAlpha -MidTerm Momentum🐎🐎
Exit krna sekhlo agle bull run ke liye, jisse ke same mistakes repeat na ho !!
Har stock turn down hota hai ! Exiting helps beating markets & catching new ones
Har stock turn down hota hai ! Exiting helps beating markets & catching new ones
Without rules you cannot conquer markets !
— EquiAlpha -MidTerm Momentum\U0001f40e\U0001f40e (@equialpha) May 3, 2022
These are my 9 sell warriors to conquer markets !
Selling is the toughest part..Some or the other sell rule always get me out !
Learn fully - https://t.co/iDlVff5KoU pic.twitter.com/u2vQvpGzEs
As I said yesterday, I will be sharing the some of my screeners in this thread 🐎
Please note Screener will help you to reach momentum but you need to see chart & further segregate trends manually (1/n)
Do retweet & like so that it reaches maximum people
Screener 1) +ve ADX DMI Breakout to find out where the action is going on a particular day, you can then look onto stocks and find setups and patterns to trade.
Link - https://t.co/fIKlWSloNw
(1/4)
Screener 2) Going one level more deep into ADX where we find up stocks which are already in trend on weekly
1) Weekly ADX >25 indicating the trend is already there
2) +DMI breaking out
3) Stock within 15% of 52w high
4) Stock above 200 SMA
Link-
Screener 3) This is based out of within 20% of ATH Stocks. I have also added few fundamentals to it. You can change variables according to it
Link -
Screener 4) RSI which is a momentum indicator
RSI breaking out can give you names where momentum is picking up and then you can look onto charts for buy points
Link -
Please note Screener will help you to reach momentum but you need to see chart & further segregate trends manually (1/n)
Do retweet & like so that it reaches maximum people
Screener 1) +ve ADX DMI Breakout to find out where the action is going on a particular day, you can then look onto stocks and find setups and patterns to trade.
Link - https://t.co/fIKlWSloNw
(1/4)
Screener 2) Going one level more deep into ADX where we find up stocks which are already in trend on weekly
1) Weekly ADX >25 indicating the trend is already there
2) +DMI breaking out
3) Stock within 15% of 52w high
4) Stock above 200 SMA
Link-
Screener 3) This is based out of within 20% of ATH Stocks. I have also added few fundamentals to it. You can change variables according to it
Link -
Screener 4) RSI which is a momentum indicator
RSI breaking out can give you names where momentum is picking up and then you can look onto charts for buy points
Link -
More from Trading strategies
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?