Grad school app season is (mostly) over, and since academic twitter is going nuts about the idea of paying research assistants $15/hr...

Let's talk about how expensive it is to be a student applying to graduate school--especially for underrepresented students.

(1/14)

This fall, I spent $515 on applying to grad school. This might sound high, but in fact, the cost was ~4 times less than it would have been in a normal year for me. Why? Mostly, the GRE.

(2/14)
Since the GRE subject tests were cancelled bc pandemic, every school I applied to no longer required the GRE, general or subject. I also had application fee waivers to 2/3 of the schools I applied to through various programs like AISES.

(3/14)
The general GRE costs $205 and the subject tests cost $150. Sending scores to more than four schools will cost you $27 for each test.

(4/14)
If I didn’t have fee waivers for 2/3 of my apps and if every school had required the GRE tests—which almost every grad school did before 2020—the estimated cost for me to apply to grad schools is well over $2000.

(5/15)
And that’s assuming I didn’t retake either GRE, and that the average fee is $75. Realistically, a lot of applicants take a GRE subject test twice, and depending on the schools, the average fee could be more like $80 or $90. In that case, the total cost is more like $2500.

(6/14)
I applied to 16 programs at 13 schools. Most people won’t apply to that many, but many students I know applied to >10. And if you have a lower GPA than many of your peers who are applying, you may need to apply to more schools to have a chance of getting into one.

(7/14)
If you’re, say, a lower-income student and/or BIPOC who has to pay your own way through college, guess what? You spend more time working than those of your peers who have known how academia works all their lives. You have less time/money/energy to get that perfect GPA.

(8/14)
At one point I held 5 jobs at the same time while taking 16 credits. You know which one paid me the least? My research assistant job, which is supposedly what's gonna get me into grad school. And I put less time into that job because I had to work the others to pay rent.

(9/14)
I am so sick of tenured professors making $100-$200k/yr talking about how you don’t go into academia for the money. There is no clearer sign that that person has no idea what kind of privilege they have--or what kind of privilege their students may not have.

(10/14)
If by some miracle I am ever running my own lab or research group, you bet I’m paying my undergrads a living wage, AND PAYING FOR THEIR GRAD SCHOOL FEES.

(11/14)
Another fun fact—the GRE that costs students thousands of dollars each year? It’s owned by ETS, a registered NONPROFIT that does not pay (most) federal taxes.

(12/14)
You know how much the CEO of ETS makes per year? Over $1.2 million. Their exec board makes $20 million a year. As a nonprofit under the guise of education. It’s DISGUSTING.

(13/14)
Please check out some BIPOC accounts to hear more about their experiences in academia: @cosmojellyfish @ximenaccid1 @_Astro_Nerd_ @jenniferxnicole @keshawnrants @That_Astro_Chic @astrotoya to name a few!

(14/14)

More from Tech

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
After getting good feedback on yesterday's thread on #routemobile I think it is logical to do a bit in-depth technical study. Place #twilio at center, keep #routemobile & #tanla at the periphery & see who is each placed.


This thread is inspired by one of the articles I read on the-ken about #postman API & how they are transforming & expediting software product delivery & consumption, leading to enhanced developer productivity.

We all know that #Twilio offers host of APIs that can be readily used for faster integration by anyone who wants to have communication capabilities. Before we move ahead, let's get a few things cleared out.

Can anyone build the programming capability to process payments or communication capabilities? Yes, but will they, the answer is NO. Companies prefer to consume APIs offered by likes of #Stripe #twilio #Shopify #razorpay etc.

This offers two benefits - faster time to market, of course that means no need to re-invent the wheel + not worrying of compliance around payment process or communication regulations. This makes entire ecosystem extremely agile

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.