#TATASTLBSL Weekly Update
Once again, approaching towards the zone of 98.35-101.05
A break-through would be a bullish indicative towards a new 52-week high.
#StockMarket #StocksToWatch https://t.co/vHfVB9asXk
#TATASTLBSL Weekly
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 6, 2021
Sustenance above 98.35 and a break-through at 101.05 will bring in a new 52-week high. #StockMarket #StocksToWatch #Metals pic.twitter.com/W5G6OeqQB9
More from Gurleen
Post the Harmonic reversal, Amongst the Pharma sector; #DRREDDY is 10% down.
Strong sell-off, There's a high probability of 4874.80 getting breached. Immediate support at 4700.20
#StockMarket https://t.co/J61wgJdzX7
#CNXPHARMA
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) July 27, 2021
Strong Breakdown but it continues to hold above a crucial support level of 14183.65
Support staying intact or A slip below this level would lead the Index either side. #StockMarket pic.twitter.com/qgBZKB4Cyo
Seems like another retest along with a follow through move. Even the support at 6100 has been taken out.
In swing support placed at 5590 followed by 4960.
#StockMarket #StocksToWatch https://t.co/bekQfLgWEK
#ULTRACEM
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) May 1, 2022
With the breakdown & retest. The major support is placed at 6100 levels. pic.twitter.com/IsoZd1grIx
You May Also Like
To me, the most important aspect of the 2018 midterms wasn't even about partisan control, but about democracy and voting rights. That's the real battle.
2/The good news: It's now an issue that everyone's talking about, and that everyone cares about.
3/More good news: Florida's proposition to give felons voting rights won. But it didn't just win - it won with substantial support from Republican voters.
That suggests there is still SOME grassroots support for democracy that transcends
4/Yet more good news: Michigan made it easier to vote. Again, by plebiscite, showing broad support for voting rights as an
5/OK, now the bad news.
We seem to have accepted electoral dysfunction in Florida as a permanent thing. The 2000 election has never really
Bad ballot design led to a lot of undervotes for Bill Nelson in Broward Co., possibly even enough to cost him his Senate seat. They do appear to be real undervotes, though, instead of tabulation errors. He doesn't really seem to have a path to victory. https://t.co/utUhY2KTaR
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 16, 2018
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x