#Tatasteel -1424.75
Objective likely 1618% (1577)
#Probability
#Tata steel -1167
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) June 14, 2021
Resistance 1248. #Probability pic.twitter.com/aloRBji3or
More from MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER
Either entry only above 1600 or let it
correct towards 987...
#Update
#CDSL -1050
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) July 9, 2021
Now above 2.618% and objective is to move higher towards 3.618%
4.236% and 4.618%....
What will Drag lower this stock price \U0001f602 ?
Only if you can sell your holding
Means Verticle rise ?
Than why it decline from (486-180.)#Observation #Perspective pic.twitter.com/evxYOjH8Qv
More from Tatasteel
#Tatasteel - 2 possible count options -
— Harsh Mehta (@_Harsh_Mehta_) June 8, 2021
Bearish - 5 waves complete (RED) and bigger retracement towards 700
Bullish - 3rd over (BLUE) and 4th goes towards 900 and then 1500+#Nifty https://t.co/ETBkbUkCO8 pic.twitter.com/an2EoHHxnU
Ready for yet another move? 📈
Daily and weekly charts attached highlighting good price volume action. Key level for upside action 1458.50
[Holding only 30% since 1200 levels]
#TataSteel #StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/bG2Gj9bFRX
#TATASTEEL Update
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) July 29, 2021
All Target's Hit \U0001f4cd
But due to the bullishness in Metal's, I'll keep on holding 30% Quantity with TSL.#StockMarket #StocksToTrade https://t.co/JukaAHg73A
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".