#tatapower
Cmp: 282.90
Above 290.6 close will be a Bullish Turtle Follow through.
Nearest Support: 250
If closes above 290.6 then nearest support could move to 276
Open Count: 372/ 468

More from Abhishek
More from Tatapower
Breached 145.80; Holding up above the level would be a bullish indicative.
Potential upside incoming towards 160 in short term & 240 in medium term. https://t.co/z2xAr1UA46

#TATAPOWER Update
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) September 15, 2021
Moving Swiftly towards 145.80; Once the level is taken out, Potential upside towards 160 in short term and 240 in medium term can be witnessed. https://t.co/zUII5RLPcI pic.twitter.com/dDk5C2PGoI
Signs are all over the place, you just needed to read them. https://t.co/17bwpa1psj

#TATAPOWER is consolidating nicely around 50 & 10-DMA.
— Ravi Sharma (@StocksNerd) April 1, 2022
3 Pocket Pivot days in the last couple of weeks are signaling the interest of buyers.
4 months long base.
Steady growth in Earnings & Sales in the last 3 quarters.
Relative Strength: 77
Group Rank: 22 pic.twitter.com/2WFeUGiV1z
Otw to 235 & 285 https://t.co/JgvNjKT3al

Tata Power - perfect for fresh long. Weak below 70. @nishkumar1977 @suru27 @rohanshah619 @indian_stockss @sanstocktrader @BissaGauravB @RajarshitaS @PAVLeader @Rishikesh_ADX @VijayThk @Investor_Mohit @TrendTrader85 pic.twitter.com/dfrFtr4yi9
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) December 18, 2020
You May Also Like
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the

chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?