Tata Elxsi - seems now also a good low-risk trade to me. However, as a cardinal rule would add on the breakout. For 20 MA followers, it is a good point to enter with a SL few percentages below MA.

More from Steve Nison
AWL - look at the ranges of contraction on the chart https://t.co/2XMhqZQu8X

Borosil Renewables - Patterns like these must be looked at carefully and must be kept on the radar. Herein price is contracting which generally signifies shifting of hands (from weak to strong). If you go wrong, the risk is limited in these. pic.twitter.com/iqyoeslZjy
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) July 12, 2021
More from Tataelxsi
Tata Elxsi https://t.co/HGCzOz1ALI

Correction \U0001f447
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) March 20, 2022
During upward breakouts, I have to consider price targets and not %age targets. Therefore the target comes out to be 8540 and not 8900 as mentioned before.
The chart stands updated.
Tata Elxsi https://t.co/sdP9X1s9qs pic.twitter.com/Gmhn3OYiNA
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".