Understanding Buyers vs Sellers using
candlesticks PART-1

Mini Thread 🧵 #trading #StockMarketindia

Traders show your support by Retweet to benefit maximum traders

@Mitesh_Engr @ITRADE191 @hjyadav @nakulvibhor @RajarshitaS @chartmojo @ca_mehtaravi

Here i am just trying to focus on few candlestick formation and trying to understand buyers vs sellers at reference levels. In trading less is more

Type 1 - Buyers aggression
Type 2 - Sellers aggression
Type 3 - Full confusion

Follow stay away approach when you are confused
Chart 1. Looking at candlesticks formation at reference levels is way more better than looking candlesticks everywhere or every second
Chart 2
Chart 3. Make your trading style as simple as possible

A small thread of Part 1 will share more examples in upcoming days and will try to post some live examples during market hours.

More from Learn to Trade

Mega learning thread . This contain some of my shared thread which might help in your trading.

Show your support by like and retweet so it can benefit many traders.

YouTube channel - https://t.co/pUUwDNoLQ5

Telegram channel - https://t.co/in1lvrigH9

#sharemarket


https://t.co/GgP9lSLndj


https://t.co/0fHWQGFcBj


https://t.co/Tzxtncwudg


https://t.co/yBTflLkPIk

More from Stocklearnings

Compilation of the best learnings from @BankniftyA through his tweets.

Have compiled his:

1. Expiry day trading.
2. Trade logics.
3. Multiple Charts analysis.
3. BTST criteria for stocks.

Share if you find it helpful so that everyone can benefit.

A pdf of his moneycontrol article where you can read about his journey and how he trades.


Advice on how to not let your mood influence your decisions.


Expiry day Trading:

How to become better?

When I had spoken to him on phone he advised me to backtest all expiries and rigorously practice them again and again to develop conviction. Superb advice!


Acts based on support and resistance levels from charts

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".