BC STOCKLEARNINGS

Saved by @SAnngeri

J A C K I S
@jackis_trader 5 years, 5 months ago 1296 views

Save to PDF Share See On Twitter

Education on SWINGS

Understanding what is a Swing is crucial in order to understand Market Structure.

It shows us the direction of the market and while it may seem obvious at first sight of the market, many still have trouble defining what a swing is.

You could define swing as simply more then 2 consecutive candles moving in one direction

When you get a few in the opposite direction you have another one

The important thing to note is that HTF swings always have more priority than LTF swings

When you zoom-in from an HTF to an LTF you will always find that one HTF swing always consists of many smaller and smaller lower timeframe swings.

You could refine this until you'd get to a 1-minute chart or even a tick chart and still you'd see the same thing happening in there

An important thing to realize is that you can have many smaller swings inside of one, big swing, and you gotta orientate yourself in this.

This takes time and practice to see as all things do but will give you an immense power over the rest when you do.

Swings also do not have to break it's previous high or low. They can happen in a contraction with HL and LH also commonly known as triangles.

You can also have many moves inside of a one Monthly Bar.

More from Stocklearnings

Supriya Rathi
@InvestorSupriya

Lesson 1: How to Find Intrinsic Value of a Stock?

🔆For long-term investors, it is necessary to know when to buy the stock.
🔆Retweet to educate everyone.

#sharemarket #stockmarket #investing #investment #trading #indianstockmarket #sharemarkettips #sharemarketstudies

Forgot to add the link: Check companies last 5yr

Sacchitanand Uttekar
@Sacchitananad

#CandleTrading : #Bullish
Attached below are some of the latest observations on the recently discussed 'Lord #NarsimhaPattern' for your #learning.

For detailed information on characteristics do go through my previous post related to the same.
Charts attached below (1/9)👇👇

Advertisement

Namrata
@Chartsbank

Let’s learn the divergence.

Whenever I teach, my moto is to make u master in that. U should get something new to learn even though when u already know that thing.

Divergence:- When price is not synchronised with the oscillator then the divergens occurs means

2/n
Means price is making higher high but oscillator doesn’t
or
price making lower low but oscillator doesn’t
means there is divergence as price is not synchronised with the oscillator.
Basically there are two kinds of divergence
-> Regular or classic.
-> Hidden divergence

3/n
A bullish divergence occurs when prices fall to a new low while an oscillator fails to reach a new low. This situation demonstrates that bears are losing power, and that bulls are ready to control the market again—often a bullish divergence marks the end of a downtrend.

4/n
Whereas Bearish divergence occurs when prices reaches to a new high while an oscillator fails to reach a new high. This situation demonstrates that bulls are losing power, and that bears are ready to control the market again—often a bearish divergence marks a halt uptrend.

5/n
Generally bullish divergence works better than bearish divergence.
bullish divergence provides you an opportunity to buy the stocks at bottom with very high risk to reward ratio.
Both divergence comes under regular or classic divergence.

itrade(DJ)
@ITRADE191

SIMPLE & FREE LEARNING FOR U ALL FRIENDS

Sacchitanand Uttekar
@Sacchitananad

#Belthold : Remember the Sumo wrestler 😅, someone did mention about it recently.
An inverse occurrence is about to witness failure, awaiting for its impact .

#CandleTrading tag would help you understand more of some of these ancient yet effective techniques...

#CandleTrading : #Bullish #Belthold #Pattern #Psychology :Pattern importance could be traced back to the traditional #Japanese sport of \u2018Sumo #wrestling'. The importance of \u2018Mawashi ( Wrestlers Belt) \u2019 & its tactical move for gripping the opponent to throwing him off the ring. pic.twitter.com/lN60xad6Ma
— Sacchitanand Uttekar (@Sacchitananad) August 16, 2020

You May Also Like

$PC\U0001f30e\u262e$

PC🌎☮
@pc_432

Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel was previously CEO of bioMerieux in France from 07-10.

Alain Merieux, who owns bioMerieux, was instrumental in the creation of the Wuhan Institute of Virology P4 Lab.

The same people who helped create the virus, also helped to create the vaccines...

Moderna partnered with French Pasteur Institute in 2015 to develop mRNA vaccine technology.

Pasteur Institute partnered with the Wuhan P4 Laboratory in 2017 along with the Merieux Foundation to study emerging viruses...
https://t.co/yFsHwrNYaK
https://t.co/9M5lydBKhM

Nobel prize winning scientist Luc Montagnier asserts that Sars-Cov-2 is man-made and originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Montagnier did extensive work with the Pasteur Institute in France which was partnered with the Wuhan P4.

Merieux Foundation & the Chinese government have worked together since 1965, and partnered to study emerging pathogens in Africa in 2015.

Their research included "PATHOGENS CARRIED BY BATS" that provoke respiratory diseases.

🚨🚨🚨
https://t.co/gVwpT0ssqI

Laurie Voss
@seldo

The 2018 State of JavaScript survey is out. They got 20,000 responses and have some delicious, delicious data. I'mma thread in some highlights:

First up: JavaScript flavors. There's TypeScript at 47% adoption, a tad higher than npm's own survey results (which said 46%). npm's survey is coming up again soon and will ask about TypeScript in a lot more detail.

I really, *really* like SoJ's "would not use again" question, which lets people who've abandoned a tech self-identify. This is noticeable in the graph above with Flow users -- 41% of people who've used Flow say they wouldn't use it again.

Now JavaScript frameworks. It's been a full year since npm's survey, so these numbers differ from ours in the directions I expected:
React 65% (vs. 60%)
Vue 29% (vs. 24%)
Ember 5% (vs 4%, I was expecting a bigger rise)

But there's a shocker in here: Angular.

npm's survey had Angular at 40% last year and SoJ has it at either:
- 58% (if you include those who don't want to use it again)
- 24% (if you count only those who like it)
Since npm's question didn't ask if they intend to *continue* using it I think that might explain this.

Advertisement

Will Buxton
@wbuxtonofficial

The Haas / Force India argument is fascinating, and the decision of the stewards may still have consequences. The first key finding is that the stewards ruled Racing Point Force India to be a valid constructor. That means that it builds its own cars.

Haas had argued that the cars had been designed by Force India, but as Haas knows only too well, "outsourcing" is legal. The stewards decided that "there is no regulatory support for the argument that Outsourcing of Listed Parts cannot come from a former or excluded team."

In determining this, the stewards also came to the following conclusion: "In relation to the submission by the Racing Point Force India F1 Team that it is not a new team, the Stewards decide that the Racing Point Force India F1 Team is indeed a new team."

This will have a big knock on effect for Haas in its continued arguments over the rights of RPFI as relates to its eligibility and rights under the complex payments structure. Haas has argued all along that RPFI should be treated as a new team and tread the same path that it did.

TLDR? Haas lost the fight but may have won the war. In having its argument that Racing Point hadn't designed their own car thrown out, they gained clarification that RPFI was a new team.

Buzz Chronicles
@buzz_chronicles

@SaveToBookmarks Namaste! You can find it here. Original tweet by @AchuthArora: "@OllieEmberson @buzz_chronicles @rattibha @SaveToBookmarks save as Workouts". Thanks! ✌

Hi! Pleasure is mine. Original tweet by @SaveToBookmarks: "@AchuthArora @OllieEmberson @buzz_chronicles @rattibha Cool mate!

I saved this ...". See You soon! 👌

What The Trans!?
@WhatTheTrans

A thread on how absurd the UK is on transgender issues and how the UK got so transphobic

In 2015 Parliament held an inquiry looking into the state of Transgender equality. Trans people of all stripes outlined many different problems across many, many different areas.

As a result Parliament created a list of recommendations including legal recognition for non binary people, gender recognition act reform, allowing 16 year olds to change their legal gender and reform of NHS gender identity services.

The government under Theresa May ignored everything that was recommended except for Gender recognition act reform. This act came into law in 2003 and gave trans men and women (but not non-binary people) the ability to legally change their gender on their birth certificates.

The process at that time to change your birth certificate under the GRA was to make an application to a panel of cisgender people who would decide if you were sufficiently trans based on your payslips, photo ID and bank statements. You would not get the option to speak to them.

(Also this process cost £140 which is just a tax on being trans)