When you get a few in the opposite direction you have another one
The important thing to note is that HTF swings always have more priority than LTF swings
Education on SWINGS
Understanding what is a Swing is crucial in order to understand Market Structure.
It shows us the direction of the market and while it may seem obvious at first sight of the market, many still have trouble defining what a swing is.
When you get a few in the opposite direction you have another one
The important thing to note is that HTF swings always have more priority than LTF swings
You could refine this until you'd get to a 1-minute chart or even a tick chart and still you'd see the same thing happening in there
More from Stocklearnings
I'm working out on a Portfolio for 3 years and I feel it can provide 2x- 3x returns till March 2024.
I've covered 6 stocks today and working on 3-4 more Stocks. Though, I've checked each aspect but 👇
** You still need to keep a track of fundamentals every quarter**
#Stock No 1
#BlackRose Ind ( Chemical)
MCAP 829 Cr
Fundamentals 👌🏻
Technical 💪🏻
Already covered Business and Financial previously and can check again below. Stocks hasn't run up in recent
#Stock No 2
#IEX (Platform Business)
MCAP 10,162 Cr
Fundamentals 👌🏻
Technical 💪🏻
This is also covered preciously and can check detailed thread on below
#Stock No 3
#Gland ( Pharmaceutical)
MCAP 39,447 Cr
Stock PE 51.9
ROCE. 30.2%
ROE 23.4%
**Major revenue comes from B2B
**Quality products
**Aim to file 20-25 ANDA each year
** Positive Management & great future outlook
#Stock No 4
#happiestminds ( IT)
MCP 7,675 Cr
Stock PE 53.7
ROCE 42.8%
ROE 83%
**Strong & experienced Management & Promotors
**OPM % has increased from 4% to 27% from Dec'19 to Dec'20.
**Significant improvement in Net cash flow
**Positive Commentry on Future outlook
I've covered 6 stocks today and working on 3-4 more Stocks. Though, I've checked each aspect but 👇
** You still need to keep a track of fundamentals every quarter**
#Stock No 1
#BlackRose Ind ( Chemical)
MCAP 829 Cr
Fundamentals 👌🏻
Technical 💪🏻
Already covered Business and Financial previously and can check again below. Stocks hasn't run up in recent
One more addition to the #Multibagger list:#BlackRose Ind: A consistent Performer in Chemical Industry.
— TheMillionaire \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@BornToBeSucceed) July 8, 2020
Thread 1/1
Primarily in the business of chemical distribution and chemical manufacturing, as well as textile manufacturing and renewable energy generation.
#Stock No 2
#IEX (Platform Business)
MCAP 10,162 Cr
Fundamentals 👌🏻
Technical 💪🏻
This is also covered preciously and can check detailed thread on below
A thread on #IEX and why you should invest..
— TheMillionaire \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@BornToBeSucceed) March 7, 2021
Business: IEX allows participants to purchase electricity for the same day through intra-day contracts, for the next day through day-ahead contingency, on daily basis for rolling seven days through daily contracts and Weekly
#Stock No 3
#Gland ( Pharmaceutical)
MCAP 39,447 Cr
Stock PE 51.9
ROCE. 30.2%
ROE 23.4%
**Major revenue comes from B2B
**Quality products
**Aim to file 20-25 ANDA each year
** Positive Management & great future outlook
#Stock No 4
#happiestminds ( IT)
MCP 7,675 Cr
Stock PE 53.7
ROCE 42.8%
ROE 83%
**Strong & experienced Management & Promotors
**OPM % has increased from 4% to 27% from Dec'19 to Dec'20.
**Significant improvement in Net cash flow
**Positive Commentry on Future outlook
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
