https://t.co/JxxXhI1jJd
https://t.co/MS5UpCuN7m
https://t.co/E4CUMbF2aN
https://t.co/b7dYAyANSh
https://t.co/2LffY62VFd
https://t.co/YCTCfX8pL5
https://t.co/xsjaVyKViX
https://t.co/ehQYgySRUZ
https://t.co/27n2rrQov7
https://t.co/YMMN69vDPQ
https://t.co/oFkunBand7
https://t.co/NgflRQwYvi
https://t.co/312DqFdjyn
https://t.co/YRbzwNGD80
https://t.co/EWxDYBtyfl
https://t.co/KXW8qOVVHr
Jack is on fire
https://t.co/rYsgDBT8h3
https://t.co/at0s4oPS46
https://t.co/VHJSdUglig
https://t.co/djltnifxDP
omo, I go update later.
them wan kill thiago today, but God dey
https://t.co/xeqnn4vKC5

More from Sport

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".