There is very little glamorous about the average western woman. No grace. No subtlety. No shyness, cuteness or warmth. Not sophisticated nor classy.

Coarse, obnoxious, aggressive, and openly, shamelessly promiscuous.

This is what "women's freedom" looks like.

Take a good look.

Perhaps if she had been a little less free to live life on her own terms, she may have retained some of the natural features of femininity that could endear a man to marry her for life.

The moral of the story here is too much freedom is even worse than too little for a woman.
Yes we may denounce the practices of more authoritarian cultures in how they limit their women, and how those women suffer at the hands of abuses of patriarchal power. But at least those women still resemble something that actually looks like a woman. They stay feminine & unugly.
Free women suffer an altogether different abuse, one only comparable to something akin to childhood neglect. Unattended, they lose their warmth and grace in their bid for self-reliance, stripping their femininity bare of all but its ugliest parts.

Free women are feral women.
And a feral woman is what you see in the video at the beginning of this thread.

An unmarriageable husk, an abomination that has all the negative qualities of the feminine, and all of the negative qualities of the masculine, with none of the positives of either

Neglect is abuse.
You see the authoritarians may harm their women through incompetent and improper uses of power, as well as malicious abuses of it.

But libertariarians abuse their women in an altogether different way - they abdicate their duty to protect and guide her. They neglect her entirely.
And then both turn around and say

"We are doing what is best for our women"

One, allowing her little room to even breathe incorrectly or make any sort of meaningful decision for herself without extreme social pressure and harsh punishment, the other, tossing her to the dogs.
Woman herself will always push for more freedoms, regardless of whether she can properly handle them or not, because insecurity is in her veins & chaos her nature, & so like a child, whether it is healthy for her or not, she will always want more, even if there's no more to have.
Look at western women, they have everything, and yet they continue to find things to want & demand with no end in sight, despite every basic right and privilege secured. And yet towards the men who've given them everything they show much scorn, almost as if they hate being free.
So they battle bitterly to gain the rights and privileges of men, and then upon attaining them, become resentful of those very same men who awarded them. Counter intuitively, gender relations deteriorate rather than improve.

"Why did you let me win" you can hear her soul cry.
They know not what's good for them, but they believe with all their hearts & souls they do. They want a say in the course of the trajectory of their own life, which is understandable, and yet given free rein they crash and burn. Women are not built for leadership or independence.
And so societies around the world idolising and emulating the west begin to copy its ways. It begins with allowing basic rights and liberties which do not seem all that unreasonable to award, correcting moral wrongs, until it snowballs out of control and civilization unravels.
It starts with "we want freely available access to birth control and the right to work, and choose who we marry"

And it ends with frivolous divorce, broken homes, widespread misandry, feminine sons, masculine daughters and the complete demonisation of any & all things masculine.
This is the sad thing about women's rights.

You cannot out of kindness, fairness and modern thinking grant them a few liberties, preserve society and be done with it.

Oh no.

Once the foot's in the door, it never ends. They will push for more until the universe itself explodes.
And so it seems we must pick our poison, limit the women, forcing them to endure a degree of masculine misuse of power for the wider benefit of society, or we do not limit them, but society in turn suffers at the hands of the destruction brought about by their unchecked freedom.

More from Society

You May Also Like

THIS.

Russia hasn't been a willing partner in this treaty for almost 3 decades. We should have ended the pretense long ago.

Naturally, Rand Paul is telling anyone who will listen to him that Trump is making a HUGE MISTAKE here.


Rand is just like his dad, Ron. 100% isolationist.

They've never grasped that 100% isolationist is not 'America First' when you examine it. It really means 'America Alone'.

The consistent grousing of pursuing military alliances with allies - like Trump is doing now with Saudi Arabia.

So of course Rand has also spent the last 2 days loudly calling for Trump to kill the arms deal with Saudi Arabia and end our alliance with them.

What Obama was engineering with his foreign policy was de facto isolationism: pull all the troops out of the ME, abandon the region to Iranian control as a client state of Russia.

Obama wasn't building an alliance with Iran; he was facilitating abandoning the ME to Iran.

Obama wouldn't even leave behind a token security force, so of course what happened was the rise of ISIS. He also pumped billions of dollars into the Iranian coffers, which the Mullah's used to fund destabilizing activity [wars/terrorism] & criminal enterprises all over the globe
Department List of UCAS-China PROFESSORs for ANSO, CSC and UCAS (fully or partial) Scholarship Acceptance
1) UCAS School of physical sciences Professor
https://t.co/9X8OheIvRw
2) UCAS School of mathematical sciences Professor

3) UCAS School of nuclear sciences and technology
https://t.co/nQH8JnewcJ
4) UCAS School of astronomy and space sciences
https://t.co/7Ikc6CuKHZ
5) UCAS School of engineering

6) Geotechnical Engineering Teaching and Research Office
https://t.co/jBCJW7UKlQ
7) Multi-scale Mechanics Teaching and Research Section
https://t.co/eqfQnX1LEQ
😎 Microgravity Science Teaching and Research

9) High temperature gas dynamics teaching and research section
https://t.co/tVIdKgTPl3
10) Department of Biomechanics and Medical Engineering
https://t.co/ubW4xhZY2R
11) Ocean Engineering Teaching and Research

12) Department of Dynamics and Advanced Manufacturing
https://t.co/42BKXEugGv
13) Refrigeration and Cryogenic Engineering Teaching and Research Office
https://t.co/pZdUXFTvw3
14) Power Machinery and Engineering Teaching and Research
I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party