The reason there is the "Only for use in Africa" label on some vaccines. Please bring every #African here:

The fundamental reason is essentially one of supply management so that #Africans also get a sizeable share of the vaccine within a reasonable time frame. In other words, it is a way to reserve a portion of the vaccine for #Africa.
It is meant to secure the vaccines for #Africa - it is the manufacturers, being aware of the scarcity of the vaccine, proactively managing supply so that there is some for #Africa.
COVID19 is a worldwide pandemic and some parts of the world are more affected than others and every nation and region is working frantically to secure some vaccine for its population.
The problem is that supply is limited, there are roughly less than a dozen vaccines that have been approved by WHO for distribution.
For some of those vaccines, a number of countries had placed orders well before the vaccine was even fully developed.

Essentially the supply of the vaccine should be on the first come, first serve basis.
Except, #African nations do not have money & never placed any orders upfront. In fact any vaccine to be supplied to #Africa states will be supplied on charity using funds raised by various nations & organisations specifically for the purpose of securing free vaccines for #Africa.
To meet all this world demand, it will take a while, months if not years and seeing #Africa is at the back of that queue, it would mean #African citizens would be waiting for quite sometime before getting their hands on any vaccine.
Aware of this, the manufacturers are labelling some of that vaccine batch "Only for use in #Africa." so as to ensure they are not redirected to other waiting customers during the distribution process.
It has nothing to do with the content of those bottles being different and specifically meant to kill #Africans.

Look nobody is interested in killing #Africans - there is no practical or economical value in doing that.
But even if the West or other powers wanted #Africans dead, the most efficient way of doing that isn't by way of engineering vaccines specifically for that purpose or by way of administering any medicine to the #African population.
All that is needed is for the West or the rest of the world to withdraw any support; technical, technological, monetary but more importantly any medical support.
Doing that would ensure that #Africans will essentially start dropping like flies from Cholera, Malaria, HIV / AIDS, Ebola and many other ailments.
In other words, ensuring the most efficient decimation (mass killing) of the #African population would require doing exactly the opposite of what you are currently afraid of.

More from Society

The Nashville Operation - A Battle in the War

A thread exploring the Nashville bombing in the context of the 2020 Digital War (via SolarWinds) against the United States perpetrated by our enemies, likely China, Iran and/or Russia.


SolarWinds Hack

A digital "Pearl Harbor" moment for the United States, whoever was responsible had access to the keys to the kingdom for months during 2020, including sensitive military infrastructure. This is war!

SunGard + SolarWinds

SolarWinds software company is owned by same company that owns SunGard, which essentially provides data center services. A secure place to host internet servers with redundant power and "big pipe" data connections.

https://t.co/U3P3SrrkM1


SunGard Data Center

In Nashville, around the corner from their "big pipe" connection, AT&T. Like any data center, highly secure. Only authorized personnel can enter, and even fewer can access the actual server rooms. Backup generators are available in case of power failure.


If the SunGard hardware was being used to "host" critical command and control software related to SolarWinds, the US powers would be very interested in gaining special access keys that are stored on the hard-drives of specific servers.
@danielashby @AdamWJT @Greens4HS2 @TheGreenParty @GarethDennis @XRebellionUK @Hs2RebelRebel @HS2ltd I'll bite. Let's try to keep it factual. There's a reasonable basis to some aspects of this question, that it might be possible to agree on. Then there are other, more variable, elements which depend on external factors such as transport and energy policy. /1

@AdamWJT @Greens4HS2 @TheGreenParty @GarethDennis @XRebellionUK @Hs2RebelRebel @HS2ltd First up, we know reasonably well how much energy it takes to propel a high-speed train along the HS2 route. We can translate that into effective CO2 generated by making some assumptions about how green the electricity grid is. /2

@AdamWJT @Greens4HS2 @TheGreenParty @GarethDennis @XRebellionUK @Hs2RebelRebel @HS2ltd Secondly, we have a reasonable grasp of how much CO2 is going to be generated by building HS2 - there are standard methods of working this out, based on the amount of steel, concrete, earthmoving, machine-fuelling etc required. /3

@AdamWJT @Greens4HS2 @TheGreenParty @GarethDennis @XRebellionUK @Hs2RebelRebel @HS2ltd Thirdly, we can estimate how much CO2 is generated by cutting down trees, and how much is captured by planting new trees. We can also estimate how much CO2 is needed to keep the railway running and generated by maintaining the track /4

@AdamWJT @Greens4HS2 @TheGreenParty @GarethDennis @XRebellionUK @Hs2RebelRebel @HS2ltd We know how much CO2 is saved by moving goods by freight train on the lines freed up by moving the express trains on to HS2, rather than by truck. /5

You May Also Like