MY PERSONAL SEXUAL HARRASSMENT CASE :

This SYED woman had her new born baby admitted at JVC NICU. Her brother in law was SHO. They seemed to have high level contacts as I got a call to take care of baby from Consultant before the baby was admitted.

Incidentally, a cousin of lady happened to be my intern just days ago, she came with her own reference.

The rule was, attendents are not allowed into ICU except 1 to change diappers & feed baby, but this family got VIP entry for more than 1 attendent for obvious reasons.
The baby was doing well, some issues had settled, others were resolving.

On fateful night, I wasn't on duty, my colleague was.

Father of baby tried to interfere beyond acceptable level. He asked my colleague why he hasn't sent such test on repeat when it wasn't needed.
Next he tried to read the file & take pics with intent to send them outside, which is illegal.

My colleague objected but attendent was VIP with SHO brother, so it ended up in fight between attendents & my colleague, with attendents breaking some property.
Next day, I went to duty & came to know about the incident.

Now I was in charge of ICU.

As I was putting my morning notes & examining patients, mother came & gave me urine culture vial & told me to do her babie's urine culture.
I told her to keep the vial there & I shall do it later on my own. She said no, you have to do it now only. I told her I've sicker patients to take care of, let me finish with them, then I'll reach to your baby too. But she refused to comply.
I commanded her to leave ICU or I shall get the security to take you out. She refused to comply, so I got the security to take her out.

She probably told her family that this doctor touched me inappropriately.

They came with iron rods, however they couldn't breach the entry.
Then they went to HOD with their cooked up story but one of the SRs refuted their story. Because SHO was from their family, they filed MOLESTATION CASE against me, my colleague & SR who confronted their lies before HOD.
As we were informed about the case, we filed a counter case - their interference prevented us from saving a life - incidentally a baby had expired that day.

This broke their morale, so they didn't fiddle with it much.
Also, I had entire ward - almost 50 attendents including a lawyer ready to be my witness - that I was most well behaved resident there, they tried to attach us with rods & she has made false allegations.
And her cousin (female doctor) had already worked me for few weeks in same unit, she was extremely ashamed of her relatives behaviour. She was too ashamed to even pass by our sight.
*with

More from Society

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.