Whenever something bad happens, people talk about passing a raft of new laws to stop it when the problem is law enforcement actively ignores the laws we already have to address these problems, especially when the perpetrators are white and/or rich.

The problem is not a lack of laws, it's a lack of enforcement.
"More laws!" is a way of looking like they're doing something instead of addressing the elephant in the room, which is that more and more restrictive laws will only end up being weaponized against Black, poor, and other marginalized people.
Because white men, especially those with money and political power, will continue getting a slap on the wrist even when committing crimes that would get someone else a lifetime in prison or shot dead in the street.
Black activists have been pointing this out for years. The impetus behind "defund" was the recognition that white supremacy is baked into to the entire justice system and cannot be fixed without ripping it up by the roots.
Similarly, sex workers have been telling everyone that these new "anti-trafficking" laws don't help anyone. They just deprive them of income while pushing them offline and into more dangerous spaces. Even cops have admitted it has made combatting real trafficking harder.
After 9/11, we created a massive security and surveillance apparatus to cover up the fact the Bush administration simply ignored intelligence warnings, and it was largely ineffectual anyway. All while ignoring the persistent and growing threat of white domestic terrorism.
And what a surprise, the post-9/11 security state and the militarization of law enforcement ended up being weaponized against immigrants and Black people.
Lo and behold, the post-9/11 security state was utterly incapable of responding to the attack on the Capitol even though the FBI and multiple other agencies were aware of the gravity of the threat. But it was ignored and enabled because the attackers were white conservatives.
So slapping on new laws and bureaucracies rarely solves anything and often makes things worse if the underlying and systemic issues are not addressed first.

That's the hard part. That's what everyone wants to avoid.

More from Society

I've seen many news articles cite that "the UK variant could be the dominant strain by March". This is emphasized by @CDCDirector.

While this will likely to be the case, this should not be an automatic cause for concern. Cases could still remain contained.

Here's how: 🧵

One of @CDCgov's own models has tracked the true decline in cases quite accurately thus far.

Their projection shows that the B.1.1.7 variant will become the dominant variant in March. But interestingly... there's no fourth wave. Cases simply level out:

https://t.co/tDce0MwO61


Just because a variant becomes the dominant strain does not automatically mean we will see a repeat of Fall 2020.

Let's look at UK and South Africa, where cases have been falling for the past month, in unison with the US (albeit with tougher restrictions):


Furthermore, the claim that the "variant is doubling every 10 days" is false. It's the *proportion of the variant* that is doubling every 10 days.

If overall prevalence drops during the studied time period, the true doubling time of the variant is actually much longer 10 days.

Simple example:

Day 0: 10 variant / 100 cases -> 10% variant
Day 10: 15 variant / 75 cases -> 20% variant
Day 20: 20 variant / 50 cases -> 40% variant

1) Proportion of variant doubles every 10 days
2) Doubling time of variant is actually 20 days
3) Total cases still drop by 50%

You May Also Like

My top 10 tweets of the year

A thread 👇

https://t.co/xj4js6shhy


https://t.co/b81zoW6u1d


https://t.co/1147it02zs


https://t.co/A7XCU5fC2m