It’s amazing how the President actually gets his enemies to do the work of burying themselves.

In this audio, which of course the President knew was being taped (after years of leaks), the President gets the Georgia Secretary of State to own the faulty data. Raffensperger cannot claim he made a mistake.
It’s a sting. “Shredded ballots” and “took out machines” - “do you know anything about that? ‘Cause that’s illegal, right?”
How can the fake news claim that this audio is false? The answer is that they can’t. It comes from one of their own, The Washington Post.
Ryan Germany, General Counsel for Georgia’s Secretary of State, jumps in. “No, Dominion has not moved any machinery out of Fulton County.”

“But have they moved the inner parts?”

“Are you sure, Ryan?”
The lawyer could have said “I don’t know,” or “We’re looking into it” or even “We can never know for sure.”

But he said: “No.”
And again: “I’m sure.”

What a stupid thing to say.

You are never, ever “sure.”

Never.

That, right there, is the telltale.
Raffensperger reiterated his statement of earnest belief and the President, clearly speaking to the hidden microphone as well as to the man, explains his claim is not credible and therefore criminal.
*reiterates
So every person who shares this audio is actually sharing an audio reflecting that the election fraud occurred, the President knows it, and the Georgia Secretary of State should know but is actively attempting to suppress reality.
This behavior is clearly an attempt to preserve a status quo, meaning a flipped election, that a reasonable person would question sincerely.
In the face of a sincere question based on rational argument and clear and convincing data, an objective government official seeks to locate the truth, regardless of where the truth may land.
President Trump says he has information to the effect that they’re shredding ballots and moving machinery, that these are CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, and furthermore that he is “NOTIFYING YOU [GA Secy of State] THAT YOU’RE LETTING IT HAPPEN.”
The rest of this is President Trump trying to give Raffensperger a way to avoid criminal prosecution.
Maybe you could argue that the President should not have been so kind.
But he is dealing with the law, and in the law, there is a standard that has to be met for a case to be won, and so I suppose he erred on the side of caution.
@threadreaderapp unroll
@threader_app compile

More from Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal PhD

POTUS calling out the Justice Department as corrupt.


To be clear, I would distinguish between regular employees of the Justice Department and the decisions made officially. It's important to do this.

It is also worth noting that "federal agents can be sued for putting Muslim men on the no-fly list in alleged retaliation for their refusal to cooperate with counterterrorism

"The decision, a rare expansion of personal liability for law-enforcement misconduct, was one of four unanimous rulings the court issued Thursday"

"The court also found that there is no statute of limitations on when rape charges can be filed in the armed services"

More from Society

Hi @officestudents @EHRC @EHRCChair @KishwerFalkner @RJHilsenrath @trussliz @GEOgovuk

The Equality and Diversity section of your job application has 'gender' in what appears to be a list of the protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010.

However...

1/15


However, 'gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

Sex is the protected characteristic under the Act, but that is not on your list.

2/15


You then ask for the 'gender' of the applicant with options:

Male
Female.

3/15


Again, 'gender' is not a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 and is not defined in the Act.

https://t.co/qisFhCiV1u

4/15


Sex is the protected characteristic and the only two possible options for sex are 'Female' and 'Male' as defined in the Act and consistent with biology, but you don't ask for that.

https://t.co/CEJ0gkr6nF

'Gender' is not a synonym for sex.

5/15

You May Also Like

Trading view scanner process -

1 - open trading view in your browser and select stock scanner in left corner down side .

2 - touch the percentage% gain change ( and u can see higest gainer of today)


3. Then, start with 6% gainer to 20% gainer and look charts of everyone in daily Timeframe . (For fno selection u can choose 1% to 4% )

4. Then manually select the stocks which are going to give all time high BO or 52 high BO or already given.

5. U can also select those stocks which are going to give range breakout or already given range BO

6 . If in 15 min chart📊 any stock sustaing near BO zone or after BO then select it on your watchlist

7 . Now next day if any stock show momentum u can take trade in it with RM

This looks very easy & simple but,

U will amazed to see it's result if you follow proper risk management.

I did 4x my capital by trading in only momentum stocks.

I will keep sharing such learning thread 🧵 for you 🙏💞🙏

Keep learning / keep sharing 🙏
@AdityaTodmal