In some rural villages, not all tribal elders are pro-TB & some are pro-Kabul Regime (KR). (recall the son who is TB & father KR)
In this Tweet, Andrew's inquiry led me to reflect.
During my time in the Taliban, I wondered how the issue of tribal interplay will be solved.
I will provide a basic synapsis & some thoughts & examples.
Taliban often try to score political points by claiming they're not against women's education; that it's "the people" who don't want it. Why does a group that imposes its rule need "the people's" approval for anything?
— Andrew Quilty (@andrewquilty) December 30, 2020
In some rural villages, not all tribal elders are pro-TB & some are pro-Kabul Regime (KR). (recall the son who is TB & father KR)
Though the TB do sustain control, in some cases, due to the cultural context, they wont override an elder's position. Why?
Here's an example. Suppose Bobzai is a tribal elder
Though the TB maintain control over the area, if Bobzai orders his son that I don't want my daughters to leave the home,
Although, Islamically, the son is correct that his sisters should be allowed in school.
Yet, in this case, culturally, to save "face", the son may keep the dispute hidden.
Yet every discussion needs a time & place. This cultural issue is also prevalent in Kabul & other areas.
For ex., PTM with Pashtun nationalism, yet in Pashtunwali, what are women inheritance rights?
None.
Do I believe that a rural village that is being droned, bombed & air-struck non-stop, that their main focus is convincing Elders on women/men's education at this moment of time?
No. (except for me & Khalid)
Recall Mullah Umar (RH) issuing Edict 104 where one of the first times in Afghan modern history, women were not forced to marry their widow's brother as it is commanded in Pashtunwali.
For example in Logar, a tribal elder passed away & the sons refused to share the sale of the land with the sister.
She approached the Taliban & asked for help.
3 days later, her brothers apologized & gave her share of the land sale.
It really is a case by case analysis in this regard.
Explicit ruling mandates the Taliban to abide by the Quran & Sunnah.
This is similar in the U.S.
You have the orthodox Jews who solve their disputes amongst their community, refusing to go to courts.
It is non-existent in that regard as the Quran & Sunnah is the explicit Taliban policy.
Yet in some areas, an Imam could solve a dispute & may not inform the Taliban of whether he took culture into context.
Though they have control over that village, they may not interfere in some cultural customs.
Yet every society has their cultural customs to account for & requires time.
We are engaging in a remote area with Elders whose thought process cannot be forced to accept on one go.
This is where the Dawah occurs. Elders require time to adjust to the world we live in.
Rome was not built in a day.
The Taliban don't need to score political points.
The IEA maintains an Islamic system at its core based on the Quran & Sunnah.
We have been working to resolve these fringe issues.
Unfort., we were invaded by 140 countries in the process, so there is a slight delay.
For many, Pashtunwali is all they know to keep going.
As mentioned some tribal elders in remote parts of Paktia/Waziristan do not see women's/men's education as a top priority.
When you read about a family that is droned or killed, even if it is 1 person.
You have to now accept the possibility, that you are now at war with that entire village.
Sometimes, they are not as educated & still follow cultural customs.
More from Society
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.

4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
We finally have the U.S. Citizenship Act Bill Text! I'm going to go through some portions of the bill right now and highlight some of the major changes and improvements that it would make to our immigration system.
Thread:
First the Bill makes a series of promises changes to the way we talk about immigrants and immigration law.
Gone would be the term "alien" and in its place is "noncitizen."
Also gone would be the term "alienage," replaced with "noncitizenship."
Now we get to the "earned path to citizenship" for all undocumented immigrants present in the United States on January 1, 2021.
Under this bill, anyone who satisfies the eligibility criteria for a new "lawful prospective immigrant status" can come out of the shadows.
So, what are the eligibility criteria for becoming a "lawful prospective immigrant status"? Those are in a new INA 245G and include:
- Payment of the appropriate fees
- Continuous presence after January 1, 2021
- Not having certain criminal record (but there's a waiver)
After a person has been in "lawful prospective immigrant status" for at least 5 years, they can apply for a green card, so long as they still pass background checks and have paid back any taxes they are required to do so by law.
However! Some groups don't have to wait 5 years.
Thread:
The immigration bill text is out!
— Nicole Narea (@nicolenarea) February 18, 2021
Senate version: https://t.co/aJUmtVW6Ir
House version: https://t.co/JMKjQaDi04
Excuse me while I go at this with a highlighter.
First the Bill makes a series of promises changes to the way we talk about immigrants and immigration law.
Gone would be the term "alien" and in its place is "noncitizen."
Also gone would be the term "alienage," replaced with "noncitizenship."

Now we get to the "earned path to citizenship" for all undocumented immigrants present in the United States on January 1, 2021.
Under this bill, anyone who satisfies the eligibility criteria for a new "lawful prospective immigrant status" can come out of the shadows.

So, what are the eligibility criteria for becoming a "lawful prospective immigrant status"? Those are in a new INA 245G and include:
- Payment of the appropriate fees
- Continuous presence after January 1, 2021
- Not having certain criminal record (but there's a waiver)

After a person has been in "lawful prospective immigrant status" for at least 5 years, they can apply for a green card, so long as they still pass background checks and have paid back any taxes they are required to do so by law.
However! Some groups don't have to wait 5 years.
