women of twitter: raise your hand if you’ve ever discovered that a male colleague with the same (or less!) years of experience and same job title as you was actually making more money?

i’ll go first: 🙋🏽‍♀️

i’ll never forget the feelings i experience when i found this out. initially, i felt shock, followed immediately by self-loathing—it seemed like the company had gotten me “on the cheap” and it made me feel incredibly like i had been incredibly stupid to not negotiate for more.
that quickly evolved into rage: how did they think it was okay to meet his negotiation demands when he was hired but not think to look at the other people at the same level and wonder if their compensation should be raised to match his, too?
i had always thought that i had always been an excellent performer at every company and role that i’ve held, so finding this news out felt a bit humiliating; i had to fight feelings of self-doubt and push myself to remember that i am stellar and deserved better—i deserved equity.
this is the moment in my career where i fully realized that i had to be own fiercest advocate. that was the moment that i decided to never assume that the company would see your worth—instead, it was always going to be on me to MAKE them to see it, or to go somewhere that would.
since then, i’ve become so much more comfortable with saying it like it is, and calling a spade a spade when i need to. but i wish i hadn’t needed to experience that moment to get there.
i know that plenty of folks aren’t assertive and firm by nature, and it’s so sad to me that my only advice to them is that they have to learn to become comfortable with being that.
this is exactly why it falls on leadership at every company and organization to foster equity through explicit pay transparency.
i can tell you from personal experience that it is truly a shitty and demoralizing feeling to find out that your company doesn’t financially value you the same as a man who has the same (or a lower) title than you.
it makes you realize that as much as our society claims to have moved forward, ultimately we really haven’t progressed nearly as far as we claim.
to be clear, i don’t believe that advocating for yourself is the ONLY way to ensure that you are paid fairly—that just happens to be what i have vowed to do for myself because that’s the only thing i feel i CAN do in many situations.
i’ve heard stories of male colleagues sharing salaries and advocating for women on their team, which also seems like a good strategy! i’ve just never been fortunate enough to have colleagues who proactively did that for me so i’ve had to be my own advocate 🤷🏽‍♀️
anyways, all of this is to say, none of this should fall on individuals. putting advocacy work on individuals is BY DEFINITION inequitable.
if you are a leader in your company, i urge you to look at how your employees are paid and ask yourself how an employee would feel when she found out she was being paid less than her colleague.
as maya angelou once put it, “people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”

More from Society

We finally have the U.S. Citizenship Act Bill Text! I'm going to go through some portions of the bill right now and highlight some of the major changes and improvements that it would make to our immigration system.

Thread:


First the Bill makes a series of promises changes to the way we talk about immigrants and immigration law.

Gone would be the term "alien" and in its place is "noncitizen."

Also gone would be the term "alienage," replaced with "noncitizenship."


Now we get to the "earned path to citizenship" for all undocumented immigrants present in the United States on January 1, 2021.

Under this bill, anyone who satisfies the eligibility criteria for a new "lawful prospective immigrant status" can come out of the shadows.


So, what are the eligibility criteria for becoming a "lawful prospective immigrant status"? Those are in a new INA 245G and include:

- Payment of the appropriate fees
- Continuous presence after January 1, 2021
- Not having certain criminal record (but there's a waiver)


After a person has been in "lawful prospective immigrant status" for at least 5 years, they can apply for a green card, so long as they still pass background checks and have paid back any taxes they are required to do so by law.

However! Some groups don't have to wait 5 years.
I've seen many news articles cite that "the UK variant could be the dominant strain by March". This is emphasized by @CDCDirector.

While this will likely to be the case, this should not be an automatic cause for concern. Cases could still remain contained.

Here's how: 🧵

One of @CDCgov's own models has tracked the true decline in cases quite accurately thus far.

Their projection shows that the B.1.1.7 variant will become the dominant variant in March. But interestingly... there's no fourth wave. Cases simply level out:

https://t.co/tDce0MwO61


Just because a variant becomes the dominant strain does not automatically mean we will see a repeat of Fall 2020.

Let's look at UK and South Africa, where cases have been falling for the past month, in unison with the US (albeit with tougher restrictions):


Furthermore, the claim that the "variant is doubling every 10 days" is false. It's the *proportion of the variant* that is doubling every 10 days.

If overall prevalence drops during the studied time period, the true doubling time of the variant is actually much longer 10 days.

Simple example:

Day 0: 10 variant / 100 cases -> 10% variant
Day 10: 15 variant / 75 cases -> 20% variant
Day 20: 20 variant / 50 cases -> 40% variant

1) Proportion of variant doubles every 10 days
2) Doubling time of variant is actually 20 days
3) Total cases still drop by 50%

You May Also Like

Still wondering about this 🤔


save as q