It is increasingly clear that the EU vaccine supply problems have bottomed out and that the news will be considerably better going forward. This shifts the "vaccine delivery problem" firmly on to the EU MS, whose capacity to quickly scale up roll outs may be severely tested. 1/n
What should vaccine transparency in the EU mean in practice and are we too pessimistic about EU vacc plans? ? Thx to @MESandbu I discovered that the \U0001f1f3\U0001f1f4 health authorities have IMO "best practices" for "backward & forward looking vacc transparency 1/12 https://t.co/vwPPgJm4Az
— Jacob F Kirkegaard (@jfkirkegaard) February 11, 2021
Exclusive:
— Sam Coates Sky (@SamCoatesSky) February 16, 2021
Every adult in the UK could receive both doses of a coronavirus vaccine by August or September "or maybe sooner if we need to", the head of the UK's Vaccine Taskforce Clive Dix has told Sky News
He tells me there is huge confidence about supply levels
Transcript pic.twitter.com/R24Pev1sOM
@GuntramWolff
@alanbeattie
@adam_tooze
@duncanrobinson
@Mij_Europe
@SonyKapoor
@john_lichfield
@tom_nuttall
@spignal
@RobinWigg
@YanniKouts
@Sam1Fleming
@hallbenjamin
@HankeVela
@StevenErlanger
@nchrysoloras
@StephenFidler1
@gideonrachman
@Simon_Nixon
@katka_cseh
More from Society
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
