First Minister @NicolaSturgeon: "I want to update Parliament on Cabinet’s review of the current lockdown restrictions which took place this morning."
In addition, I will give an assessment of the current state of the pandemic."
The total number of positive cases reported yesterday was 773.
This represents 6% of all tests carried out, and means the overall number of cases is now 193,148."
And 100 people are in intensive care, 2 fewer than yesterday."
As of 8:30 this morning, 1,288,004 people in Scotland had received their first dose of the vaccine."
It means that we have now given a first dose of vaccine to 28% of the adult population in Scotland."
Vaccination hasn’t simply been offered to everyone in these categories."
We have administered first doses to virtually all residents in older people’s care homes, and more than 90% of residents in all care homes."
So too have 94% of those in the 70 to 79-year-old age group."
So please get in touch with your GP, call the helpline or, as a last resort, email me. The address is [email protected]."
The protection from the first dose doesn’t kick in for 2-3 weeks and, even then, we don’t know exactly what impact it will have on transmission of the virus."
At the end of December, more than a third of all Covid deaths - 34% to be precise - took place in care homes."
I think we do have much more reason to be hopeful now than we did just a few weeks ago that this is a race we can and we will ultimately win - if we are prepared to stick with it."
But at the same time we have also been slowing down the virus.
Lockdown has been working."
The most recent figure is 810. That is a significant and sustained fall."
But of course, and as always, it has to be seen in context.
Case numbers have been falling because we have been in lockdown."
In addition, we think we are seeing some signs that cases are falling more slowly now than they was the case a few weeks ago."
I know that is frustrating and can seem counter-intuitive."
That is what the government is now very much focused on doing.
But as we do so, there are two points that it is important for me to stress."
I know this is difficult given how desperate all of us are to get back to something close to normal, but if we open up too quickly to meet arbitrary dates, we do risk setting our progress back."
And secondly, probably for a while yet, 100% normality is unlikely to be possible."
That’s why you will hear me talk increasingly about trade-offs."
As I’ll come on to discuss shortly, we are choosing to use the very limited headroom we have right now to get at least some children back to school - because children’s education and wellbeing is such a priority."
That is a trade-off we need to be willing to make."
And it will be important for me and for the government to be very upfront about the choices we face."
That is why the framework will also try to be clear about what we don’t think will be possible for a while longer."
Indeed, doing that for a further period is essential to permit the headroom necessary for the change I am about to confirm."
We will need to monitor the impact of this change very carefully before taking any further decisions."
We have also decided that all teachers and lecturers involved in awarding national qualifications this year will receive a one-off payment of £400."
Further details concerning the payment, and these assessment support days, will be provided in due course."
But there is a more general and over-riding message that I need to set out and emphasise today."
In addition, if you are a parent whose children will soon be going back to primary school, I can only imagine what a relief that will be."
The hard, but inescapable fact is this: if the return to school leads to more contacts between adults over the next few weeks, transmission of the virus will quickly rise again."
It would also set back our progress more generally."
And while I can’t set out an indicative date for that today, I hope to be in a position to do so in two weeks’ time."
And that means sticking to the current lockdown rules."
I desperately wish that I could be firmer now about exactly when and how we will exit lockdown in the weeks ahead."
So please continue to stick to the letter and the spirit of the rules."
Follow the FACTS advice when you have to go out and about.
Work from home if you can – and if you are an employer, support your employees to work from home."
More from The SNP
More from Society
This is a piece I've been thinking about for a long time. One of the most dominant policy ideas in Washington is that policy should, always and everywhere, move parents into paid labor. But what if that's wrong?
My reporting here convinced me that there's no large effect in either direction on labor force participation from child allowances. Canada has a bigger one than either Romney or Biden are considering, and more labor force participation among women.
But what if that wasn't true?
Forcing parents into low-wage, often exploitative, jobs by threatening them and their children with poverty may be counted as a success by some policymakers, but it’s a sign of a society that doesn’t value the most essential forms of labor.
The problem is in the very language we use. If I left my job as a New York Times columnist to care for my 2-year-old son, I’d be described as leaving the labor force. But as much as I adore him, there is no doubt I’d be working harder. I wouldn't have stopped working!
I tried to render conservative objections here fairly. I appreciate that @swinshi talked with me, and I'm sorry I couldn't include everything he said. I'll say I believe I used his strongest arguments, not more speculative ones, in the piece.
My reporting here convinced me that there's no large effect in either direction on labor force participation from child allowances. Canada has a bigger one than either Romney or Biden are considering, and more labor force participation among women.
But what if that wasn't true?
Forcing parents into low-wage, often exploitative, jobs by threatening them and their children with poverty may be counted as a success by some policymakers, but it’s a sign of a society that doesn’t value the most essential forms of labor.
The problem is in the very language we use. If I left my job as a New York Times columnist to care for my 2-year-old son, I’d be described as leaving the labor force. But as much as I adore him, there is no doubt I’d be working harder. I wouldn't have stopped working!
I tried to render conservative objections here fairly. I appreciate that @swinshi talked with me, and I'm sorry I couldn't include everything he said. I'll say I believe I used his strongest arguments, not more speculative ones, in the piece.
I appreciate his intellectual curiosity and effort. I have quibbles. But my big disappointment is there was no mention of unintended consequences, which we discussed and which are kind of THE core conservative concern on this issue.
— \U0001d682\U0001d68c\U0001d698\U0001d69d\U0001d69d \U0001d686\U0001d692\U0001d697\U0001d69c\U0001d691\U0001d692\U0001d699 (@swinshi) February 18, 2021
You May Also Like
fascinated by this man, mario cortellucci, and his outsized influence on ontario and GTA politics. cortellucci, who lives in vaughan and ran as a far-right candidate for the italian senate back in 2018 - is a major ford donor...
his name might sound familiar because the new cortellucci vaughan hospital at mackenzie health, the one doug ford has been touting lately as a covid-centric facility, is named after him and his family
but his name also pops up in a LOT of other ford projects. for instance - he controls the long term lease on big parts of toronto's portlands... where doug ford once proposed building an nfl stadium and monorail... https://t.co/weOMJ51bVF
cortellucci, who is a developer, also owns a large chunk of the greenbelt. doug ford's desire to develop the greenbelt has been
and late last year he rolled back the mandate of conservation authorities there, prompting the resignations of several members of the greenbelt advisory
his name might sound familiar because the new cortellucci vaughan hospital at mackenzie health, the one doug ford has been touting lately as a covid-centric facility, is named after him and his family
but his name also pops up in a LOT of other ford projects. for instance - he controls the long term lease on big parts of toronto's portlands... where doug ford once proposed building an nfl stadium and monorail... https://t.co/weOMJ51bVF
cortellucci, who is a developer, also owns a large chunk of the greenbelt. doug ford's desire to develop the greenbelt has been
and late last year he rolled back the mandate of conservation authorities there, prompting the resignations of several members of the greenbelt advisory