First Minister @NicolaSturgeon: "I want to update Parliament on Cabinet’s review of the current lockdown restrictions which took place this morning."
In addition, I will give an assessment of the current state of the pandemic."
The total number of positive cases reported yesterday was 773.
This represents 6% of all tests carried out, and means the overall number of cases is now 193,148."
And 100 people are in intensive care, 2 fewer than yesterday."
As of 8:30 this morning, 1,288,004 people in Scotland had received their first dose of the vaccine."
It means that we have now given a first dose of vaccine to 28% of the adult population in Scotland."
Vaccination hasn’t simply been offered to everyone in these categories."
We have administered first doses to virtually all residents in older people’s care homes, and more than 90% of residents in all care homes."
So too have 94% of those in the 70 to 79-year-old age group."
So please get in touch with your GP, call the helpline or, as a last resort, email me. The address is [email protected]."
The protection from the first dose doesn’t kick in for 2-3 weeks and, even then, we don’t know exactly what impact it will have on transmission of the virus."
At the end of December, more than a third of all Covid deaths - 34% to be precise - took place in care homes."
I think we do have much more reason to be hopeful now than we did just a few weeks ago that this is a race we can and we will ultimately win - if we are prepared to stick with it."
But at the same time we have also been slowing down the virus.
Lockdown has been working."
The most recent figure is 810. That is a significant and sustained fall."
But of course, and as always, it has to be seen in context.
Case numbers have been falling because we have been in lockdown."
In addition, we think we are seeing some signs that cases are falling more slowly now than they was the case a few weeks ago."
I know that is frustrating and can seem counter-intuitive."
That is what the government is now very much focused on doing.
But as we do so, there are two points that it is important for me to stress."
I know this is difficult given how desperate all of us are to get back to something close to normal, but if we open up too quickly to meet arbitrary dates, we do risk setting our progress back."
And secondly, probably for a while yet, 100% normality is unlikely to be possible."
That’s why you will hear me talk increasingly about trade-offs."
As I’ll come on to discuss shortly, we are choosing to use the very limited headroom we have right now to get at least some children back to school - because children’s education and wellbeing is such a priority."
That is a trade-off we need to be willing to make."
And it will be important for me and for the government to be very upfront about the choices we face."
That is why the framework will also try to be clear about what we don’t think will be possible for a while longer."
Indeed, doing that for a further period is essential to permit the headroom necessary for the change I am about to confirm."
We will need to monitor the impact of this change very carefully before taking any further decisions."
We have also decided that all teachers and lecturers involved in awarding national qualifications this year will receive a one-off payment of £400."
Further details concerning the payment, and these assessment support days, will be provided in due course."
But there is a more general and over-riding message that I need to set out and emphasise today."
In addition, if you are a parent whose children will soon be going back to primary school, I can only imagine what a relief that will be."
The hard, but inescapable fact is this: if the return to school leads to more contacts between adults over the next few weeks, transmission of the virus will quickly rise again."
It would also set back our progress more generally."
And while I can’t set out an indicative date for that today, I hope to be in a position to do so in two weeks’ time."
And that means sticking to the current lockdown rules."
I desperately wish that I could be firmer now about exactly when and how we will exit lockdown in the weeks ahead."
So please continue to stick to the letter and the spirit of the rules."
Follow the FACTS advice when you have to go out and about.
Work from home if you can – and if you are an employer, support your employees to work from home."
More from The SNP
More from Society
The Nashville Operation - A Battle in the War
A thread exploring the Nashville bombing in the context of the 2020 Digital War (via SolarWinds) against the United States perpetrated by our enemies, likely China, Iran and/or Russia.
SolarWinds Hack
A digital "Pearl Harbor" moment for the United States, whoever was responsible had access to the keys to the kingdom for months during 2020, including sensitive military infrastructure. This is war!
SunGard + SolarWinds
SolarWinds software company is owned by same company that owns SunGard, which essentially provides data center services. A secure place to host internet servers with redundant power and "big pipe" data connections.
https://t.co/U3P3SrrkM1
SunGard Data Center
In Nashville, around the corner from their "big pipe" connection, AT&T. Like any data center, highly secure. Only authorized personnel can enter, and even fewer can access the actual server rooms. Backup generators are available in case of power failure.
If the SunGard hardware was being used to "host" critical command and control software related to SolarWinds, the US powers would be very interested in gaining special access keys that are stored on the hard-drives of specific servers.
A thread exploring the Nashville bombing in the context of the 2020 Digital War (via SolarWinds) against the United States perpetrated by our enemies, likely China, Iran and/or Russia.
SolarWinds Hack
A digital "Pearl Harbor" moment for the United States, whoever was responsible had access to the keys to the kingdom for months during 2020, including sensitive military infrastructure. This is war!
SunGard + SolarWinds
SolarWinds software company is owned by same company that owns SunGard, which essentially provides data center services. A secure place to host internet servers with redundant power and "big pipe" data connections.
https://t.co/U3P3SrrkM1
SunGard Data Center
In Nashville, around the corner from their "big pipe" connection, AT&T. Like any data center, highly secure. Only authorized personnel can enter, and even fewer can access the actual server rooms. Backup generators are available in case of power failure.
If the SunGard hardware was being used to "host" critical command and control software related to SolarWinds, the US powers would be very interested in gaining special access keys that are stored on the hard-drives of specific servers.
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?