First Minister @NicolaSturgeon: "I want to update Parliament on Cabinet’s review of the current lockdown restrictions which took place this morning."
In addition, I will give an assessment of the current state of the pandemic."
The total number of positive cases reported yesterday was 773.
This represents 6% of all tests carried out, and means the overall number of cases is now 193,148."
And 100 people are in intensive care, 2 fewer than yesterday."
As of 8:30 this morning, 1,288,004 people in Scotland had received their first dose of the vaccine."
It means that we have now given a first dose of vaccine to 28% of the adult population in Scotland."
Vaccination hasn’t simply been offered to everyone in these categories."
We have administered first doses to virtually all residents in older people’s care homes, and more than 90% of residents in all care homes."
So too have 94% of those in the 70 to 79-year-old age group."
So please get in touch with your GP, call the helpline or, as a last resort, email me. The address is [email protected]."
The protection from the first dose doesn’t kick in for 2-3 weeks and, even then, we don’t know exactly what impact it will have on transmission of the virus."
At the end of December, more than a third of all Covid deaths - 34% to be precise - took place in care homes."
I think we do have much more reason to be hopeful now than we did just a few weeks ago that this is a race we can and we will ultimately win - if we are prepared to stick with it."
But at the same time we have also been slowing down the virus.
Lockdown has been working."
The most recent figure is 810. That is a significant and sustained fall."
But of course, and as always, it has to be seen in context.
Case numbers have been falling because we have been in lockdown."
In addition, we think we are seeing some signs that cases are falling more slowly now than they was the case a few weeks ago."
I know that is frustrating and can seem counter-intuitive."
That is what the government is now very much focused on doing.
But as we do so, there are two points that it is important for me to stress."
I know this is difficult given how desperate all of us are to get back to something close to normal, but if we open up too quickly to meet arbitrary dates, we do risk setting our progress back."
And secondly, probably for a while yet, 100% normality is unlikely to be possible."
That’s why you will hear me talk increasingly about trade-offs."
As I’ll come on to discuss shortly, we are choosing to use the very limited headroom we have right now to get at least some children back to school - because children’s education and wellbeing is such a priority."
That is a trade-off we need to be willing to make."
And it will be important for me and for the government to be very upfront about the choices we face."
That is why the framework will also try to be clear about what we don’t think will be possible for a while longer."
Indeed, doing that for a further period is essential to permit the headroom necessary for the change I am about to confirm."
We will need to monitor the impact of this change very carefully before taking any further decisions."
We have also decided that all teachers and lecturers involved in awarding national qualifications this year will receive a one-off payment of £400."
Further details concerning the payment, and these assessment support days, will be provided in due course."
But there is a more general and over-riding message that I need to set out and emphasise today."
In addition, if you are a parent whose children will soon be going back to primary school, I can only imagine what a relief that will be."
The hard, but inescapable fact is this: if the return to school leads to more contacts between adults over the next few weeks, transmission of the virus will quickly rise again."
It would also set back our progress more generally."
And while I can’t set out an indicative date for that today, I hope to be in a position to do so in two weeks’ time."
And that means sticking to the current lockdown rules."
I desperately wish that I could be firmer now about exactly when and how we will exit lockdown in the weeks ahead."
So please continue to stick to the letter and the spirit of the rules."
Follow the FACTS advice when you have to go out and about.
Work from home if you can – and if you are an employer, support your employees to work from home."
More from The SNP
More from Society
global health policy in 2020 has centered around NPI's (non-pharmaceutical interventions) like distancing, masks, school closures
these have been sold as a way to stop infection as though this were science.
this was never true and that fact was known and knowable.
let's look.
above is the plot of social restriction and NPI vs total death per million. there is 0 R2. this means that the variables play no role in explaining one another.
we can see this same relationship between NPI and all cause deaths.
this is devastating to the case for NPI.
clearly, correlation is not proof of causality, but a total lack of correlation IS proof that there was no material causality.
barring massive and implausible coincidence, it's essentially impossible to cause something and not correlate to it, especially 51 times.
this would seem to pose some very serious questions for those claiming that lockdowns work, those basing policy upon them, and those claiming this is the side of science.
there is no science here nor any data. this is the febrile imaginings of discredited modelers.
this has been clear and obvious from all over the world since the beginning and had been proven so clearly by may that it's hard to imagine anyone who is actually conversant with the data still believing in these responses.
everyone got the same R
these have been sold as a way to stop infection as though this were science.
this was never true and that fact was known and knowable.
let's look.
above is the plot of social restriction and NPI vs total death per million. there is 0 R2. this means that the variables play no role in explaining one another.
we can see this same relationship between NPI and all cause deaths.
this is devastating to the case for NPI.
clearly, correlation is not proof of causality, but a total lack of correlation IS proof that there was no material causality.
barring massive and implausible coincidence, it's essentially impossible to cause something and not correlate to it, especially 51 times.
this would seem to pose some very serious questions for those claiming that lockdowns work, those basing policy upon them, and those claiming this is the side of science.
there is no science here nor any data. this is the febrile imaginings of discredited modelers.
this has been clear and obvious from all over the world since the beginning and had been proven so clearly by may that it's hard to imagine anyone who is actually conversant with the data still believing in these responses.
everyone got the same R
this methodology is a little complex, so let me explain what i did.
— el gato malo (@boriquagato) May 30, 2020
a few EU countries provide real day of death data. this lets us plot meaningful curves to show rate of disease change.
what struck me is how similar all the curves were.
everyone got the same shape. pic.twitter.com/bN0hILzoSl
Like most movements, I have learned that the definition of feminism has expanded to include simply treating women like human beings.
(A thread for whoever feels like reading)
I have observed feminists on Twitter advocating for rape victims to be heard, rapists to be held accountable, for people to address the misogyny that is deeply rooted in our culture, and for women to be treated with respect.
To me, very easy things to get behind.
And the amount of pushback they receive for those very basic requests is appalling. I see men trip over themselves to defend rape and rapists and misogyny every chance they get. Some accounts are completely dedicated to harassing women on this site. It’s unhealthy.
Furthermore, I have observed how dedicated these misogynists are by how they treat other men that do not immediately side with them. There is an entire lexicon they have created for men who do not openly treat women with disrespect.
Ex: simp, cuck, white knight, beta
All examples of terms they use to demean a man who respects women.
To paraphrase what a wise man on this app said:
Some men hate women so much, they hate men who don’t hate women
(A thread for whoever feels like reading)
Neighborhood gents, what\u2019s something you\u2019ve learned about feminism (or gained a better understanding of) that you think other men should know?
— feminist next door (@emrazz) February 19, 2021
Note - the quoted is a friendly/good faith replier. https://t.co/048kuxxX6q
I have observed feminists on Twitter advocating for rape victims to be heard, rapists to be held accountable, for people to address the misogyny that is deeply rooted in our culture, and for women to be treated with respect.
To me, very easy things to get behind.
And the amount of pushback they receive for those very basic requests is appalling. I see men trip over themselves to defend rape and rapists and misogyny every chance they get. Some accounts are completely dedicated to harassing women on this site. It’s unhealthy.
Furthermore, I have observed how dedicated these misogynists are by how they treat other men that do not immediately side with them. There is an entire lexicon they have created for men who do not openly treat women with disrespect.
Ex: simp, cuck, white knight, beta
All examples of terms they use to demean a man who respects women.
To paraphrase what a wise man on this app said:
Some men hate women so much, they hate men who don’t hate women