To be clear, I am neither ‘pro’ nor ‘anti’ vaccination. A vaccination is a medical intervention. In the old (pre-hysteria) days, prior to March 2020, any doctor would confirm that any medical intervention should be based on a risk -v- reward analysis.......

1/n

2/n

The overall IFR of Coronavirus is around 0.2%, similar to seasonal flu. It’s much lower for most people and you can assess your personal risk here:

https://t.co/Oz0f0iQpER

Cont.....
3/n

For some reason, hysteria has taken over and we are now being held hostage to rushed, novel mRNA ‘vaccines’ which remain in Phase 3 trials and have not been fully assessed. Little, if anything, is known about potential iatrogenic effects.....

Cont......
4/n

And these products have not been assessed in relation to (for example) interactions with other medications; their potential effects on people with existing auto-immune conditions etc.

They have been granted Emergency Use Authorisation only.......

Cont.....
5/n

And it is arguable that the EUA should now be withdrawn as more is now known about effective therapeutic medications such as ivermectin and others. Nevertheless, the vaccination ‘push’ continues apace despite numerous eminently qualified people questioning the safety.....
6/n

The Nuremberg Code requires that ‘fully informed consent’ is given by the recipient in advance of any medical intervention but the necessary information for such consent is not being offered routinely........

Cont......
7/n

This means that people are unaware of the potential risks and are lining up to take part in clinical trials without the full and proper information.

For information, the following series of tweets set out the concerns of some eminently qualified people.......

Cont.......
8/n

I do not claim that any of the following are ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ however the claims made must, surely, be taken seriously and tested to destruction before accepting this vaccine/gene-therapy being injected into the majority of the global population?

Cont.......
9/n

Professor Dolores Cahill giving evidence to the German Corona Committee in advance of worldwide court cases......

https://t.co/dxSTsI9F3M

Cont......
10/n

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi......

https://t.co/cYPw4xi8cJ

Cont.....
11/n

UK adverse reactions......

https://t.co/dsmLLQsCHt

Cont.....
12/n

Various........

https://t.co/Yv2mCZU2XU
13/13

There are many more like this and I won’t post them all here.

I would reiterate: Any medical intervention should be based on a risk -v- reward calculation and I am neither ‘pro’ nor ‘anti’ vaccine.

I do, however, have serious concerns based upon a reasoned argument.

More from Society

I've seen many news articles cite that "the UK variant could be the dominant strain by March". This is emphasized by @CDCDirector.

While this will likely to be the case, this should not be an automatic cause for concern. Cases could still remain contained.

Here's how: 🧵

One of @CDCgov's own models has tracked the true decline in cases quite accurately thus far.

Their projection shows that the B.1.1.7 variant will become the dominant variant in March. But interestingly... there's no fourth wave. Cases simply level out:

https://t.co/tDce0MwO61


Just because a variant becomes the dominant strain does not automatically mean we will see a repeat of Fall 2020.

Let's look at UK and South Africa, where cases have been falling for the past month, in unison with the US (albeit with tougher restrictions):


Furthermore, the claim that the "variant is doubling every 10 days" is false. It's the *proportion of the variant* that is doubling every 10 days.

If overall prevalence drops during the studied time period, the true doubling time of the variant is actually much longer 10 days.

Simple example:

Day 0: 10 variant / 100 cases -> 10% variant
Day 10: 15 variant / 75 cases -> 20% variant
Day 20: 20 variant / 50 cases -> 40% variant

1) Proportion of variant doubles every 10 days
2) Doubling time of variant is actually 20 days
3) Total cases still drop by 50%

You May Also Like