Animal Pharma innovators are actively looking at competent, reliable API/CDMO partners.
"We predict that the sourcing, partnering, development and funding of innovation will be more transformational and significant the next five years than ever before in animal health" - #Elanco
More from Sajal Kapoor
Go 🇮🇳 Go 👏👏
Watch the journey of\xa0Insulin Glargine's landmark USFDA approval for first interchangeable #biosimilar for the treatment of diabetes, a testament to #BioconBiologics' scientific excellence & robust quality comparibility data. https://t.co/JSM4LPqYdh
— Biocon (@Bioconlimited) August 1, 2021
More from Sequent
Market is short sighted and loves to buy high and sell low
Sequent is a long gestation stock, it won't deliver it's real earnings until FY23-25
Not suitable investment for those who want 100% return/yr
@itsTarH hey Tariq, any idea why is Sequent falling?
— Vivek (@pa_stock) September 27, 2021
https://t.co/7ytUeSd7gg
Don't expect the earnings to go anywhere till FY23.
— Tar \u26a1 (@itsTarH) August 10, 2021
Real growth will only come post FY24.
I expect the stock to either correct or stay muted till then. https://t.co/lUQfzxojTO
Having multiple facilities accredited with certifications from the best authorities from globe is a hidden moat in itself... 10-20% pop and then retracement should not shake confidence... Business focus and longevity should build conviction
— Harinder S Nanda (@harindersnanda) July 14, 2021
\U0001f436\U0001f431\U0001f434\U0001f42e\U0001f437\U0001f411@unseenvalue @soicfinance
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
1. IQ is one of the most heritable psychological traits – that is, individual differences in IQ are strongly associated with individual differences in genes (at least in fairly typical modern environments). https://t.co/3XxzW9bxLE
2. The heritability of IQ *increases* from childhood to adulthood. Meanwhile, the effect of the shared environment largely fades away. In other words, when it comes to IQ, nature becomes more important as we get older, nurture less. https://t.co/UqtS1lpw3n
3. IQ scores have been increasing for the last century or so, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. https://t.co/sCZvCst3hw (N ≈ 4 million)
(Note that the Flynn effect shows that IQ isn't 100% genetic; it doesn't show that it's 100% environmental.)
4. IQ predicts many important real world outcomes.
For example, though far from perfect, IQ is the single-best predictor of job performance we have – much better than Emotional Intelligence, the Big Five, Grit, etc. https://t.co/rKUgKDAAVx https://t.co/DWbVI8QSU3
5. Higher IQ is associated with a lower risk of death from most causes, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, most forms of cancer, homicide, suicide, and accident. https://t.co/PJjGNyeQRA (N = 728,160)