![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQtiELVacAIMXEj.jpg)
The time has finally arrived to simplify how we use the volume indicator on our charts. With a Tradingview script at the end, here is a thread๐งต on what โsimpleโ volumes are, & how to use them: ๐
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQthoC2akAcOsnv.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQtiELVacAIMXEj.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQtiPDtaMAMLsTO.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQtiZ7NaAAIE_xA.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQtieamaAAA3YIf.jpg)
https://t.co/y801M17j9R
More from Nitin R
More from Screeners
I use 4 scanners:
1) Volatility, Volume & daily range compression scanner
2) Punch-Drunk-Love
3) GE Ratio - to track fundamentally strong stocks
4) Recently created one to track Power Play setups.
I get around 150-200 stocks daily & choose the ones with the most potential.
1) Volatility, Volume & daily range compression scanner
2) Punch-Drunk-Love
3) GE Ratio - to track fundamentally strong stocks
4) Recently created one to track Power Play setups.
I get around 150-200 stocks daily & choose the ones with the most potential.
Sir, How do u find a set up - Do you track chart of each stock daily ? Or do u have filters , that lead you to a number of stocks , after which you scan them.
— AKASH GUPTA (@lockdownmurti) August 25, 2021
How was the trap set in USA Small-Cap index
Russell 2000
It is better if you spend considerable time learning these concepts. https://t.co/caBHOO4Owa
Russell 2000
It is better if you spend considerable time learning these concepts. https://t.co/caBHOO4Owa
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTmE9EzVEAAWy6T.png)
TRAPS? In a false breakout, the price breaks out of the range & comes back within the range. A trap is one step ahead, price not only comes back within the range but breaks down in the opposite direction. It traps the initial longs who didn't close their positions
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) January 22, 2022
Russell 2000 pic.twitter.com/txzjdnStzc
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x