Technical analysis & trading mainly concentrate on trending stocks because they are visually very convincing. But TA on rangebound stocks is often neglected from books & hence from trading too. Mean reversion is what rule the price move in such stocks.
It's a goldmine, learn it
More from Aneesh Philomina Antony (ProdigalTrader)
More from Screeners
Still having the same view. Will update if there is any change. Falling trendline breakout doesn't work that way in a bear market the way it works in a bull market. Updating your methods according to the market is the key.
#nifty50 https://t.co/64ZktWHQev
#nifty50 https://t.co/64ZktWHQev

This is the maximum upside for now, post that I am looking for an 8-9% fall in index.#nifty50 pic.twitter.com/BcSOiwWuBs
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) June 24, 2022
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".