"Quote Retweet" ur mail ID
if u want free scanner for the strategy posted below.
I will send separate Scanners for
1. EOD analysis for preparing trade plan
2. Live Trading with entry signals
Bullish scanner for day/swing trading
— Aneesh Philomina Antony (ProdigalTrader) (@ProdigalTrader) March 3, 2022
Stocks which made new 52 week high in last 1 month, today closed at day high & abv previous day range.
Bearish scanner for day/ swing trading
Stocks made new 52 week low in last 1 month, today closed below previous day low & near day low.
More from Aneesh Philomina Antony (ProdigalTrader)
U can guage the strength in the trend once u know how to measure the direction.
This trend strength is infact signals the trend continuity or the potetnial for sustanining the trend.
Thats great assurace to hav https://t.co/HanLvlXkjQ
Before making ur trade entry or even before making a bias of trend as either bullish or bearish, do u use any objective measures to define the trend based on price, volume and momentum?
— Aneesh Philomina Antony (@ProdigalTrader) May 15, 2021
Price will always go back and forth move no matter how strong the trend is.
1/4 pic.twitter.com/qqizh2JO3J
Start fibo retracement from swing high, not the other way around. Simply 0 point should b where retracement started
2.
The base should b chosen as major swing low. Can't just pick a random point
Similar views (shared Yesterday) Aneesh Bhai\U0001f447https://t.co/UxJZFdWJxh
— Bharat Sahni (@NiveshakBharat) September 29, 2021
More from Screeners
For new followers ...
If u r a pivot based intraday trader, u should have this cheat sheet. Follow this and C. Your wrong trades will reduce considerably. Good luck.
#FREETIPS
— ScorpioManoj (@scorpiomanojFRM) April 1, 2022
Pivot Rules snapshot
A free one page cheat sheet for pivot based trading that could probably be sold for a hefty price ....
Rem: This is just a broad set of rules. There are many advance rules more than this. pic.twitter.com/FnzmGGKx0P
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x