Came in my this scan :
15m Adx rising with Di+ > DI-
+ 15m RSI rising
+ 15m RSI above 15m average RSI.
Same for Godrej Prop.
More from Screeners
This scan will give you linear/smooth/non-choppy trends which are great for pullback trades for working people.
#BroTip
#BroTip
If you want to trade only stocks with established trend/momentum, then you can look for stocks which have never(or barely did) closed below a certain MA (say 50MA) in the last say 50 days.
— Manas Arora (@iManasArora) November 8, 2021
There are countless ways to run scans. Just have to get creative. #BroTip
May please read the attached tweet once again for a key LEARNING
USDINR - a breakout that will not bode well for the equities
78+ https://t.co/AWqZxF5B1L
USDINR - a breakout that will not bode well for the equities
78+ https://t.co/AWqZxF5B1L
Can you anticipate a breakout? Yes
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) June 10, 2022
the attached tweet.
now the chart is for USDINR https://t.co/Vb2wKaCvTB pic.twitter.com/INo0GC4fGY
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".