More from Nishant Kumar
More from Sail
Sail:
Views are for educational purpose.
Riding from levels of 47 (Refer old tweet, tagged)
Impulse wave cycle + subs, completed and now waves adjusted.
This major wave 5 will only unfold, once it gives a closing above 153 levels on a weekly basis.
Pic 1 is for investors https://t.co/d4xtiRI45j
Another condition (refer 2nd image) is formation of a pennant (giving a sneak peak for a BO, closing awaited).
This is for short term / positional players
OI data is skewed because of expiry & will be misleading currently.
DYOR for opportunities
Views are for educational purpose.
Riding from levels of 47 (Refer old tweet, tagged)
Impulse wave cycle + subs, completed and now waves adjusted.
This major wave 5 will only unfold, once it gives a closing above 153 levels on a weekly basis.
Pic 1 is for investors https://t.co/d4xtiRI45j

— Vipul Kankaria (@cobbervipul) May 1, 2021
Another condition (refer 2nd image) is formation of a pennant (giving a sneak peak for a BO, closing awaited).
This is for short term / positional players
OI data is skewed because of expiry & will be misleading currently.
DYOR for opportunities
#SRF any similarity in chart pattern!? 🧐 Remember, this was my trigger from list of 3 stocks in watchlist.
Today, don't ask me for new watchlist - I will be mostly 'Watching' 😏 https://t.co/0BeDHtB55r
Today, don't ask me for new watchlist - I will be mostly 'Watching' 😏 https://t.co/0BeDHtB55r

#SAIL Directionally it is headed to 140/150 levels next over short period of time. SL - todays low pic.twitter.com/1IE4eJn9px
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) April 13, 2021
You May Also Like
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.

4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.